Literature DB >> 25301991

Enhanced Multi-Protocol Analysis via Intelligent Supervised Embedding (EMPrAvISE): Detecting Prostate Cancer on Multi-Parametric MRI.

Satish Viswanath1, B Nicolas Bloch2, Jonathan Chappelow1, Pratik Patel1, Neil Rofsky3, Robert Lenkinski4, Elisabeth Genega4, Anant Madabhushi1.   

Abstract

Currently, there is significant interest in developing methods for quantitative integration of multi-parametric (structural, functional) imaging data with the objective of building automated meta-classifiers to improve disease detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. Such techniques are required to address the differences in dimensionalities and scales of individual protocols, while deriving an integrated multi-parametric data representation which best captures all disease-pertinent information available. In this paper, we present a scheme called Enhanced Multi-Protocol Analysis via Intelligent Supervised Embedding (EMPrAvISE); a powerful, generalizable framework applicable to a variety of domains for multi-parametric data representation and fusion. Our scheme utilizes an ensemble of embeddings (via dimensionality reduction, DR); thereby exploiting the variance amongst multiple uncorrelated embeddings in a manner similar to ensemble classifier schemes (e.g. Bagging, Boosting). We apply this framework to the problem of prostate cancer (CaP) detection on 12 3 Tesla pre-operative in vivo multi-parametric (T2-weighted, Dynamic Contrast Enhanced, and Diffusion-weighted) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, in turn comprising a total of 39 2D planar MR images. We first align the different imaging protocols via automated image registration, followed by quantification of image attributes from individual protocols. Multiple embeddings are generated from the resultant high-dimensional feature space which are then combined intelligently to yield a single stable solution. Our scheme is employed in conjunction with graph embedding (for DR) and probabilistic boosting trees (PBTs) to detect CaP on multi-parametric MRI. Finally, a probabilistic pairwise Markov Random Field algorithm is used to apply spatial constraints to the result of the PBT classifier, yielding a per-voxel classification of CaP presence. Per-voxel evaluation of detection results against ground truth for CaP extent on MRI (obtained by spatially registering pre-operative MRI with available whole-mount histological specimens) reveals that EMPrAvISE yields a statistically significant improvement (AUC=0.77) over classifiers constructed from individual protocols (AUC=0.62, 0.62, 0.65, for T2w, DCE, DWI respectively) as well as one trained using multi-parametric feature concatenation (AUC=0.67).

Entities:  

Keywords:  3 Tesla; CAD; DCE-MRI; DWI-MRI; T2w MRI; ensemble embedding; multi-modal integration; multi-parametric; multi-protocol; non-rigid registration; probabilistic boosting trees; prostate cancer; supervised learning

Year:  2011        PMID: 25301991      PMCID: PMC4187222          DOI: 10.1117/12.878312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  21 in total

1.  Kernel-based data fusion and its application to protein function prediction in yeast.

Authors:  G R G Lanckriet; M Deng; N Cristianini; M I Jordan; W S Noble
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2004

2.  Spectral embedding based probabilistic boosting tree (ScEPTre): classifying high dimensional heterogeneous biomedical data.

Authors:  Pallavi Tiwari; Mark Rosen; Galen Reed; John Kurhanewicz; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2009

3.  Investigating the efficacy of nonlinear dimensionality reduction schemes in classifying gene and protein expression studies.

Authors:  George Lee; Carlos Rodriguez; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Elastic registration of multimodal prostate MRI and histology via multiattribute combined mutual information.

Authors:  Jonathan Chappelow; B Nicolas Bloch; Neil Rofsky; Elizabeth Genega; Robert Lenkinski; William DeWolf; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with T2-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasushi Kaji; Yoshitatsu Fukabori; Ken-ichiro Yoshida; Narufumi Suganuma; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Determining histology-MRI slice correspondences for defining MRI-based disease signatures of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gaoyu Xiao; B Nicolas Bloch; Jonathan Chappelow; Elizabeth M Genega; Neil M Rofsky; Robert E Lenkinski; John Tomaszewski; Michael D Feldman; Mark Rosen; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  High-throughput detection of prostate cancer in histological sections using probabilistic pairwise Markov models.

Authors:  James P Monaco; John E Tomaszewski; Michael D Feldman; Ian Hagemann; Mehdi Moradi; Parvin Mousavi; Alexander Boag; Chris Davidson; Purang Abolmaesumi; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.

Authors:  M Chen; H-D Dang; J-Y Wang; C Zhou; S-Y Li; W-C Wang; W-F Zhao; Z-H Yang; C-Y Zhong; G-Z Li
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Multiparametric tissue characterization of brain neoplasms and their recurrence using pattern classification of MR images.

Authors:  Ragini Verma; Evangelia I Zacharaki; Yangming Ou; Hongmin Cai; Sanjeev Chawla; Seung-Koo Lee; Elias R Melhem; Ronald Wolf; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

View more
  7 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer with MRI.

Authors:  Baowei Fei
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09

2.  Computer aided diagnosis of prostate cancer: A texton based approach.

Authors:  Andrik Rampun; Bernie Tiddeman; Reyer Zwiggelaar; Paul Malcolm
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Spatio-temporal texture (SpTeT) for distinguishing vulnerable from stable atherosclerotic plaque on dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MRI in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Tao Wan; Anant Madabhushi; Alkystis Phinikaridou; James A Hamilton; Ning Hua; Tuan Pham; Jovanna Danagoulian; Ross Kleiman; Andrew J Buckler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Gleason Probability Maps: A Radiomics Tool for Mapping Prostate Cancer Likelihood in MRI Space.

Authors:  Sean D McGarry; John D Bukowy; Kenneth A Iczkowski; Jackson G Unteriner; Petar Duvnjak; Allison K Lowman; Kenneth Jacobsohn; Mark Hohenwalter; Michael O Griffin; Alex W Barrington; Halle E Foss; Tucker Keuter; Sarah L Hurrell; William A See; Marja T Nevalainen; Anjishnu Banerjee; Peter S LaViolette
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03

6.  MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Tong Chen; Zhiyuan Zhang; Shuangxiu Tan; Yueyue Zhang; Chaogang Wei; Shan Wang; Wenlu Zhao; Xusheng Qian; Zhiyong Zhou; Junkang Shen; Yakang Dai; Jisu Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Radio-pathomic mapping model generated using annotations from five pathologists reliably distinguishes high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sean D McGarry; John D Bukowy; Kenneth A Iczkowski; Allison K Lowman; Michael Brehler; Samuel Bobholz; Andrew Nencka; Alex Barrington; Kenneth Jacobsohn; Jackson Unteriner; Petar Duvnjak; Michael Griffin; Mark Hohenwalter; Tucker Keuter; Wei Huang; Tatjana Antic; Gladell Paner; Watchareepohn Palangmonthip; Anjishnu Banerjee; Peter S LaViolette
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-09-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.