The potential synergism and benefit of combined hyperthermia and radiation for cancer treatment is well established, but has yet to be optimized clinically. Specifically, the delivery of heat via external arrays /applicators or interstitial antennas has not demonstrated the spatial precision or specificity necessary to achieve appropriate a highly positive therapeutic ratio. Recently, antibody directed and possibly even non-antibody directed iron oxide nanoparticle hyperthermia has shown significant promise as a tumor treatment modality. Our studies are designed to determine the effects (safety and efficacy) of iron oxide nanoparticle hyperthermia and external beam radiation in a murine breast cancer model. METHODS: MTG-B murine breast cancer cells (1 × 106) were implanted subcutaneous in 7 week-old female C3H/HeJ mice and grown to a treatment size of 150 mm3 +/- 50 mm3. Tumors were then injected locally with iron oxide nanoparticles and heated via an alternating magnetic field (AMF) generator operated at approximately 160 kHz and 400 - 550 Oe. Tumor growth was monitored daily using standard 3-D caliper measurement technique and formula. specific Mouse tumors were heated using a cooled, 36 mm diameter square copper tube induction coil which provided optimal heating in a 1 cm wide region in the center of the coil. Double dextran coated 80 nm iron oxide nanoparticles (Triton Biosystems) were used in all studies. Intra-tumor, peri-tumor and rectal (core body) temperatures were continually measured throughout the treatment period. RESULTS: Preliminary in vivo nanoparticle-AMF hyperthermia (167 KHz and 400 or 550 Oe) studies demonstrated dose responsive cytotoxicity which enhanced the effects of external beam radiation. AMF associated eddy currents resulted in nonspecific temperature increases in exposed tissues which did not contain nanoparticles, however these effects were minor and not injurious to the mice. These studies also suggest that iron oxide nanoparticle hyperthermia is more effective than nonnanoparticle tumor heating techniques when similar thermal doses are applied. Initial electron and light microscopy studies of iron oxide nanoparticle and AMF exposed tumor cells show a rapid uptake of particles and acute cytotoxicity following AMF exposure.
The potential synergism and benefit of combined hyperthermia and radiation for cancer treatment is well established, but has yet to be optimized clinically. Specifically, the delivery of heat via external arrays /applicators or interstitial antennas has not demonstrated the spatial precision or specificity necessary to achieve appropriate a highly positive therapeutic ratio. Recently, antibody directed and possibly even non-antibody directed iron oxide nanoparticle hyperthermia has shown significant promise as a tumor treatment modality. Our studies are designed to determine the effects (safety and efficacy) of iron oxide nanoparticle hyperthermia and external beam radiation in a murinebreast cancer model. METHODS: MTG-B murinebreast cancer cells (1 × 106) were implanted subcutaneous in 7 week-old female C3H/HeJ mice and grown to a treatment size of 150 mm3 +/- 50 mm3. Tumors were then injected locally with iron oxide nanoparticles and heated via an alternating magnetic field (AMF) generator operated at approximately 160 kHz and 400 - 550 Oe. Tumor growth was monitored daily using standard 3-D caliper measurement technique and formula. specific Mousetumors were heated using a cooled, 36 mm diameter square copper tube induction coil which provided optimal heating in a 1 cm wide region in the center of the coil. Double dextran coated 80 nm iron oxide nanoparticles (Triton Biosystems) were used in all studies. Intra-tumor, peri-tumor and rectal (core body) temperatures were continually measured throughout the treatment period. RESULTS: Preliminary in vivo nanoparticle-AMF hyperthermia (167 KHz and 400 or 550 Oe) studies demonstrated dose responsive cytotoxicity which enhanced the effects of external beam radiation. AMF associated eddy currents resulted in nonspecific temperature increases in exposed tissues which did not contain nanoparticles, however these effects were minor and not injurious to the mice. These studies also suggest that iron oxide nanoparticle hyperthermia is more effective than nonnanoparticle tumor heating techniques when similar thermal doses are applied. Initial electron and light microscopy studies of iron oxide nanoparticle and AMF exposed tumor cells show a rapid uptake of particles and acute cytotoxicity following AMF exposure.
Authors: C C Vernon; J W Hand; S B Field; D Machin; J B Whaley; J van der Zee; W L van Putten; G C van Rhoon; J D van Dijk; D González González; F F Liu; P Goodman; M Sherar Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1996-07-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Manfred Johannsen; Burghard Thiesen; Uwe Gneveckow; Kasra Taymoorian; Norbert Waldöfner; Regina Scholz; Serdar Deger; Klaus Jung; Stefan A Loening; Andreas Jordan Journal: Prostate Date: 2006-01-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Sally J DeNardo; Gerald L DeNardo; Laird A Miers; Arutselvan Natarajan; Alan R Foreman; Cordula Gruettner; Grete N Adamson; Robert Ivkov Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: P K Sneed; P R Stauffer; M W McDermott; C J Diederich; K R Lamborn; M D Prados; S Chang; K A Weaver; L Spry; M K Malec; S A Lamb; B Voss; R L Davis; W M Wara; D A Larson; T L Phillips; P H Gutin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1998-01-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Jordan; P Wust; R Scholz; B Tesche; H Fähling; T Mitrovics; T Vogl; J Cervós-Navarro; R Felix Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 1996 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: M Van Vulpen; A A C De Leeuw; B W Raaymakers; R J A Van Moorselaar; P Hofman; J J W Lagendijk; J J Battermann Journal: BJU Int Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: John A Kalapurakal; Margaret Pierce; Alan Chen; Vythialingam Sathiaseelan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hattie L Ring; Zhe Gao; Anirudh Sharma; Zonghu Han; Charles Lee; Kelvin G M Brockbank; Elizabeth D Greene; Kristi L Helke; Zhen Chen; Lia H Campbell; Bradley Weegman; Monica Davis; Michael Taylor; Sebastian Giwa; Gregory M Fahy; Brian Wowk; Roberto Pagotan; John C Bischof; Michael Garwood Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ian Baker; Steve N Fiering; Karl E Griswold; P Jack Hoopes; Katerina Kekalo; Christian Ndong; Keith Paulsen; Alicea A Petryk; Brian Pogue; Fridon Shubitidze; John Weaver Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2015 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: C L Dennis; A J Jackson; J A Borchers; P J Hoopes; R Strawbridge; A R Foreman; J van Lierop; C Grüttner; R Ivkov Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 3.874