Literature DB >> 25301893

Running economy, not aerobic fitness, independently alters thermoregulatory responses during treadmill running.

Jovana Smoljanić1, Nathan B Morris2, Sheila Dervis1, Ollie Jay3.   

Abstract

We sought to determine the independent influence of running economy (RE) and aerobic fitness [maximum oxygen consumption (V̇O 2max)] on thermoregulatory responses during treadmill running by conducting two studies. In study 1, seven high (HI-FIT: 61 ± 5 ml O2 · kg(-1) · min(-1)) and seven low (LO-FIT: 45 ± 4 ml O2 · kg(-1) · min(-1)) V̇O 2max males matched for physical characteristics and RE (HI-FIT: 200 ± 21; LO-FIT: 200 ± 18 ml O2 · kg(-1) · km(-1)) ran for 60 min at 1) 60%V̇O 2max and 2) a fixed metabolic heat production (Hprod) of 640 W. In study 2, seven high (HI-ECO: 189 ± 15.3 ml O2 · kg(-1) · km(-1)) and seven low (LO-ECO: 222 ± 10 ml O2 · kg(-1) · km(-1)) RE males matched for physical characteristics and V̇O 2max (HI-ECO: 60 ± 3; LO-ECO: 61 ± 7 ml O2 · kg(-1) · min(-1)) ran for 60 min at a fixed 1) speed of 10.5 km/h and 2) Hprod of 640 W. Environmental conditions were 25.4 ± 0.8°C, 37 ± 12% RH. In study 1, at Hprod of 640 W, similar changes in esophageal temperature (ΔTes; HI-FIT: 0.63 ± 0.20; LO-FIT: 0.63 ± 0.22°C; P = 0.986) and whole body sweat losses (WBSL; HI-FIT: 498 ± 66; LO-FIT: 497 ± 149 g; P = 0.984) occurred despite different relative intensities (HI-FIT: 55 ± 6; LO-FIT: 39 ± 2% V̇O 2max; P < 0.001). At 60% V̇O 2max, ΔTes (P = 0.029) and WBSL (P = 0.003) were greater in HI-FIT (1.14 ± 0.32°C; 858 ± 130 g) compared with LO-FIT (0.73 ± 0.34°C; 609 ± 123 g), as was Hprod (HI-FIT: 12.6 ± 0.9; LO-FIT: 9.4 ± 1.0 W/kg; P < 0.001) and the evaporative heat balance requirement (Ereq; HI-FIT: 691 ± 74; LO-FIT: 523 ± 65 W; P < 0.001). Similar sweating onset ΔTes and thermosensitivities occurred between V̇O 2max groups. In study 2, at 10.5 km/h, ΔTes (1.16 ± 0.31 vs. 0.78 ± 0.28°C; P = 0.017) and WBSL (835 ± 73 vs. 667 ± 139 g; P = 0.015) were greater in LO-ECO, as was Hprod (13.5 ± 0.6 vs. 11.3 ± 0.8 W/kg; P < 0.001) and Ereq (741 ± 89 vs. 532 ± 130 W; P = 0.007). At Hprod of 640 W, ΔTes (P = 0.910) and WBSL (P = 0.710) were similar between HI-ECO (0.55 ± 0.31°C; 501 ± 88 g) and LO-ECO (0.57 ± 0.16°C; 483 ± 88 g), but running speed was different (HI-ECO: 8.2 ± 0.6; LO-ECO: 7.2 ± 0.4 km/h; P = 0.025). In conclusion, thermoregulatory responses during treadmill running are not altered by V̇O 2max, but by RE because of differences in Hprod and Ereq.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  V̇o2max; core temperature; experimental design; heat balance; sweating

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301893      PMCID: PMC4269685          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00665.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  43 in total

1.  A NEW WEIGHTING SYSTEM FOR MEAN SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE HUMAN BODY.

Authors:  N L RAMANATHAN
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  Thermoregulatory responses to exercise: relative versus absolute intensity.

Authors:  Nicholas Gant; Clyde Williams; Job King; Benjamin J Hodge
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 4.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement.

Authors:  Michael N Sawka; Louise M Burke; E Randy Eichner; Ronald J Maughan; Scott J Montain; Nina S Stachenfeld
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  A simple and valid method to determine thermoregulatory sweating threshold and sensitivity.

Authors:  Samuel N Cheuvront; Shawn E Bearden; Robert W Kenefick; Brett R Ely; David W Degroot; Michael N Sawka; Scott J Montain
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-05-07

6.  Temperature responses in severely burned children during exercise in a hot environment.

Authors:  Serina J McEntire; David L Chinkes; David N Herndon; Oscar E Suman
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.845

7.  Critical environmental limits for exercising heat-acclimated lean and obese boys.

Authors:  Kelly Anne Dougherty; Mosuk Chow; W Larry Kenney
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Running economy of elite male and elite female runners.

Authors:  J Daniels; N Daniels
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 9.  Children's thermoregulation during exercise in the heat: a revisit.

Authors:  Bareket Falk; Raffy Dotan
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.665

Review 10.  Thermoregulation during exercise in the heat in children: old concepts revisited.

Authors:  Thomas Rowland
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-12-13
View more
  14 in total

1.  A comparison of thermoregulatory responses to exercise between mass-matched groups with large differences in body fat.

Authors:  Sheila Dervis; Geoff B Coombs; Georgia K Chaseling; Davide Filingeri; Jovana Smoljanic; Ollie Jay
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-12-23

2.  Is Heat Intolerance State or Trait?

Authors:  Yuri Hosokawa; Rebecca L Stearns; Douglas J Casa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Activity modification in heat: critical assessment of guidelines across athletic, occupational, and military settings in the USA.

Authors:  Yuri Hosokawa; Douglas J Casa; Juli M Trtanj; Luke N Belval; Patricia A Deuster; Sarah M Giltz; Andrew J Grundstein; Michelle D Hawkins; Robert A Huggins; Brenda Jacklitsch; John F Jardine; Hunter Jones; Josh B Kazman; Mark E Reynolds; Rebecca L Stearns; Jennifer K Vanos; Alan L Williams; W Jon Williams
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 4.  Human temperature regulation under heat stress in health, disease, and injury.

Authors:  Matthew N Cramer; Daniel Gagnon; Orlando Laitano; Craig G Crandall
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 46.500

5.  Limitations to Thermoregulation and Acclimatization Challenge Human Adaptation to Global Warming.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Hanna; Peter W Tait
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The optimal exercise intensity for the unbiased comparison of thermoregulatory responses between groups unmatched for body size during uncompensable heat stress.

Authors:  Nicholas Ravanelli; Matthew Cramer; Pascal Imbeault; Ollie Jay
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-03

7.  Thermoregulation During Pregnancy: a Controlled Trial Investigating the Risk of Maternal Hyperthermia During Exercise in the Heat.

Authors:  Agalyaa Puhenthirar; James W Smallcombe; William Casasola; Daniela S Inoue; Georgia K Chaseling; Nicholas Ravanelli; Kate M Edwards; Ollie Jay
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Sex difference in initial thermoregulatory response to dehydrated exercise in the heat.

Authors:  Gabrielle E W Giersch; Margaret C Morrissey; Cody R Butler; Abigail T Colburn; Zachariah S Demarais; Stavros A Kavouras; Ollie Jay; Nisha Charkoudian; Douglas J Casa
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-07

9.  A new approach for comparing thermoregulatory responses of subjects with different body sizes.

Authors:  Ollie Jay; Matthew N Cramer
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2015-02-11

10.  The Effect of Low Ambient Relative Humidity on Physical Performance and Perceptual Responses during Load Carriage.

Authors:  Igor B Mekjavic; Ursa Ciuha; Mikael Grönkvist; Ola Eiken
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.