Agalyaa Puhenthirar1, James W Smallcombe1, William Casasola1,2, Daniela S Inoue1,3, Georgia K Chaseling1, Nicholas Ravanelli1, Kate M Edwards1, Ollie Jay4,5. 1. Thermal Ergonomics Laboratory, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. 2. Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. 3. Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Thermal Ergonomics Laboratory, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. Ollie.jay@sydney.edu.au. 5. The University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Ollie.jay@sydney.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Despite the well-established benefits of exercise, pregnant women are discouraged from physical activity in hot/humid conditions to avoid hyperthermia (core temperature (Tcore) ≥ 39.0 °C). Recent epidemiological evidence also demonstrates greater risk of negative birth outcomes following heat exposure during pregnancy, possibly due to thermoregulatory impairments. We aimed to determine (1) the risk of pregnant women exceeding a Tcore of 39.0 °C during moderate-intensity exercise in the heat; and (2) if any thermoregulatory impairments are evident in pregnant (P) versus non-pregnant (NP) women. METHODS: Thirty participants (15 pregnant in their second trimester or third trimester) completed two separate exercise-heat exposures in a climate chamber (32 °C, 45%RH). On separate occasions, each participant cycled on a semi-recumbent cycle ergometer for 45 min at a workload representative of a moderate-intensity (1) non-weight-bearing (NON-WB), or (2) weight-bearing (WB) activity. Thermoregulatory responses were monitored throughout. RESULTS: The highest rectal temperature observed in a pregnant individual was 37.93 °C. Mean end-exercise rectal temperature did not differ between groups (P:37.53 ± 0.22 °C, NP:37.52 ± 0.34 °C, P = 0.954) in the WB trial, but was lower in the P group (P:37.48 ± 0.25 °C, vs NP:37.73 ± 0.38 °C, P = 0.041) in the NON-WB trial. Whole-body sweat loss was unaltered by pregnancy during WB (P:266 ± 62 g, NP:264 ± 77 g; P = 0.953) and NON-WB P:265 ± 51 g, NP:300 ± 75 g; P = 0.145) exercise. Pregnant participants reported higher ratings of thermal sensation (felt hotter) than their non-pregnant counterparts in the WB trial (P = 0.002) but not in the NON-WB trial, (P = 0.079). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women can perform 45 min of moderate-intensity exercise at 32 °C, 45%RH with very low apparent risk of excessive maternal hyperthermia. No thermoregulatory impairments with pregnancy were observed.
OBJECTIVES: Despite the well-established benefits of exercise, pregnant women are discouraged from physical activity in hot/humid conditions to avoid hyperthermia (core temperature (Tcore) ≥ 39.0 °C). Recent epidemiological evidence also demonstrates greater risk of negative birth outcomes following heat exposure during pregnancy, possibly due to thermoregulatory impairments. We aimed to determine (1) the risk of pregnant women exceeding a Tcore of 39.0 °C during moderate-intensity exercise in the heat; and (2) if any thermoregulatory impairments are evident in pregnant (P) versus non-pregnant (NP) women. METHODS: Thirty participants (15 pregnant in their second trimester or third trimester) completed two separate exercise-heat exposures in a climate chamber (32 °C, 45%RH). On separate occasions, each participant cycled on a semi-recumbent cycle ergometer for 45 min at a workload representative of a moderate-intensity (1) non-weight-bearing (NON-WB), or (2) weight-bearing (WB) activity. Thermoregulatory responses were monitored throughout. RESULTS: The highest rectal temperature observed in a pregnant individual was 37.93 °C. Mean end-exercise rectal temperature did not differ between groups (P:37.53 ± 0.22 °C, NP:37.52 ± 0.34 °C, P = 0.954) in the WB trial, but was lower in the P group (P:37.48 ± 0.25 °C, vs NP:37.73 ± 0.38 °C, P = 0.041) in the NON-WB trial. Whole-body sweat loss was unaltered by pregnancy during WB (P:266 ± 62 g, NP:264 ± 77 g; P = 0.953) and NON-WB P:265 ± 51 g, NP:300 ± 75 g; P = 0.145) exercise. Pregnant participants reported higher ratings of thermal sensation (felt hotter) than their non-pregnant counterparts in the WB trial (P = 0.002) but not in the NON-WB trial, (P = 0.079). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women can perform 45 min of moderate-intensity exercise at 32 °C, 45%RH with very low apparent risk of excessive maternal hyperthermia. No thermoregulatory impairments with pregnancy were observed.
Authors: Michelle F Mottola; Margie H Davenport; Stephanie-May Ruchat; Gregory A Davies; Veronica J Poitras; Casey E Gray; Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia; Nick Barrowman; Kristi B Adamo; Mary Duggan; Ruben Barakat; Phil Chilibeck; Karen Fleming; Milena Forte; Jillian Korolnek; Taniya Nagpal; Linda G Slater; Deanna Stirling; Lori Zehr Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Kelly R Evenson; Ruben Barakat; Wendy J Brown; Patricia Dargent-Molina; Megumi Haruna; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Michelle F Mottola; Katrine M Owe; Emily K Rousham; SeonAe Yeo Journal: Am J Lifestyle Med Date: 2014-03
Authors: Louisa Samuels; Britt Nakstad; Nathalie Roos; Ana Bonell; Matthew Chersich; George Havenith; Stanley Luchters; Louise-Tina Day; Jane E Hirst; Tanya Singh; Kirsty Elliott-Sale; Robyn Hetem; Cherie Part; Shobna Sawry; Jean Le Roux; Sari Kovats Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 3.738