Kalev Nõupuu1, Winston Lee2, Jana Zernant2, Stephen H Tsang3, Rando Allikmets3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States Eye Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the developmental stages and genetic etiology of the optical gap phenotype in recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). METHODS: Single and longitudinal data points from 15 patients, including four sibling pairs, exhibiting an optical gap phenotype on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with confirmed disease-causing ABCA4 alleles were retrospectively analyzed. Fundus images with corresponding SD-OCT scans were collected with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Structural phenotypes were assigned to three developmental stages according to SD-OCT. The ABCA4 gene was screened in all patients. RESULTS: At least two disease-causing ABCA4 variants where identified in each patient; all except one (91%) were compound heterozygous for the p.G1961E mutation. All patients exhibited structural findings on SD-OCT that grouped into three progressive developmental stages over several years. Stage 1 was characterized by mild disruptions of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) band over the fovea. Stage 2 was a progressive expansion of the EZ band loss resulting in an empty lesion devoid of photoreceptors. Stage 3 observed a structural collapse of the inner retinal layers into the optical gap space leading to involvement and atrophy of the RPE thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: The optical gap phenotype in STGD1 can be structurally divided into three progressive stages spanning several years. This particular phenotype also appears to be highly associated with the p.G1961E mutation of ABCA4. Taken together, it appears that a focal loss of photoreceptors sequentially precedes RPE dysfunction in the early development of ABCA4-associated optical gap lesions. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
PURPOSE: To investigate the developmental stages and genetic etiology of the optical gap phenotype in recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). METHODS: Single and longitudinal data points from 15 patients, including four sibling pairs, exhibiting an optical gap phenotype on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with confirmed disease-causing ABCA4 alleles were retrospectively analyzed. Fundus images with corresponding SD-OCT scans were collected with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Structural phenotypes were assigned to three developmental stages according to SD-OCT. The ABCA4 gene was screened in all patients. RESULTS: At least two disease-causing ABCA4 variants where identified in each patient; all except one (91%) were compound heterozygous for the p.G1961E mutation. All patients exhibited structural findings on SD-OCT that grouped into three progressive developmental stages over several years. Stage 1 was characterized by mild disruptions of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) band over the fovea. Stage 2 was a progressive expansion of the EZ band loss resulting in an empty lesion devoid of photoreceptors. Stage 3 observed a structural collapse of the inner retinal layers into the optical gap space leading to involvement and atrophy of the RPE thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: The optical gap phenotype in STGD1 can be structurally divided into three progressive stages spanning several years. This particular phenotype also appears to be highly associated with the p.G1961E mutation of ABCA4. Taken together, it appears that a focal loss of photoreceptors sequentially precedes RPE dysfunction in the early development of ABCA4-associated optical gap lesions. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Authors: Panagiotis I Sergouniotis; Graham E Holder; Anthony G Robson; Michel Michaelides; Andrew R Webster; Anthony T Moore Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Jana Zernant; Carl Schubert; Kate M Im; Tomas Burke; Carolyn M Brown; Gerald A Fishman; Stephen H Tsang; Peter Gouras; Michael Dean; Rando Allikmets Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Theodore Leng; Michael F Marmor; Ulrich Kellner; Dorothy A Thompson; Agnes B Renner; William Moore; Jane C Sowden Journal: Retina Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Rishi R Doshi; Jorge A Fortun; Brian T Kim; Sander R Dubovy; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Abigail T Fahim; Naheed W Khan; Sarwar Zahid; Ira H Schachar; Kari Branham; Susanne Kohl; Bernd Wissinger; Victor M Elner; John R Heckenlively; Thiran Jayasundera Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Lijuan Zhang; Andrew Zheng; Hongping Nie; Kavita V Bhavsar; Yu Xu; David H Sliney; Stephen L Trokel; Stephen H Tsang Journal: Ophthalmic Genet Date: 2016 Impact factor: 1.803
Authors: Esmee H Runhart; Patty Dhooge; Magda Meester-Smoor; Jeroen Pas; Jan Willem R Pott; Redmer van Leeuwen; Hester Y Kroes; Arthur A Bergen; Yvonne de Jong-Hesse; Alberta A Thiadens; Mary J van Schooneveld; Maria van Genderen; Camiel Boon; Caroline Klaver; L Ingeborg van den Born; Frans P M Cremers; Carel B Hoyng Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 3.988
Authors: Winston Lee; Jana Zernant; Takayuki Nagasaki; Laurie L Molday; Pei-Yin Su; Gerald A Fishman; Stephen H Tsang; Robert S Molday; Rando Allikmets Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 5.121
Authors: Winston Lee; Yajing Xie; Jana Zernant; Bo Yuan; Srilaxmi Bearelly; Stephen H Tsang; James R Lupski; Rando Allikmets Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 5.881