Literature DB >> 25301397

The role of rarebit perimetry in evaluation of functional outcome after successful macular hole and epiretinal membrane surgery.

Lana Dujmović1, Goran Benčić, Zoran Vatavuk.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25301397     DOI： 10.1007/s00417-014-2825-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN： 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  New perimetric techniques: a comparison between rarebit and frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Lene Martin; Peter Wanger
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Perception of very small visual stimuli in the fovea: normative data for the Rarebit Foveal Test.

Authors:  M Nilsson; P Wanger; L Martin
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Variability of rarebit and standard perimetry sizes I and III in normals.

Authors:  Jesse M Vislisel; Carrie K Doyle; Chris A Johnson; Michael Wall
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Early detection of macular changes in patients with diabetes using Rarebit Fovea Test and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  M Nilsson; G von Wendt; P Wanger; L Martin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Rarebit perimetry and fovea test before and after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Maria Nilsson; Oran Abdiu; Carl-Gustaf Laurell; Lene Martin
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.761
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.