Literature DB >> 25301088

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and its association with reduced mortality: evidence for selection bias.

Ismail Jatoi1, Helen M Parsons.   

Abstract

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) refers to removal of the opposite uninvolved breast in women with unilateral breast cancer, and rates are increasing worldwide. In observational studies, CPM is often associated with reductions in breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality when compared to unilateral surgical treatment alone, but this may reflect selection of a healthier cohort for CPM (selection bias). To further explore this possibility, we examined the association between CPM and non-cancer mortality, an indicator of selection bias. We identified 449,178 adult women diagnosed with unilateral, primary American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-III ductal or lobular breast cancer, utilizing the 1998-2010 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Of these, 5.8% (n = 25,961) underwent CPM as their first course of treatment. We examined associations between CPM and breast cancer-specific, all-cause, and non-cancer mortality utilizing multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for age, race, AJCC stage, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and histologic grade of the tumor. Among all patients receiving CPM as first course of treatment, CPM was associated with lower breast cancer-specific [HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.79-0.89)], all-cause [HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.88)], and non-cancer [HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.64-0.80)] 5-year hazard of death. Although our results are consistent with other observational studies showing associations between CPM and reductions in breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, we demonstrate an even stronger association between CPM and reduced non-cancer mortality. Thus, the reported associations between CPM and reductions in mortality might at least partly be attributable to selection bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301088      PMCID: PMC4501767          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3160-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  28 in total

1.  Bias and causal associations in observational research.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Review of risk factors for the development of contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid M Lizarraga; Sonia L Sugg; Ronald J Weigel; Carol E H Scott-Conner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Bias in analytic research.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979

4.  Population-based study of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival outcomes of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Isabelle Bedrosian; Chung-Yuan Hu; George J Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Katharine Yao; Andrew K Stewart; David J Winchester; David P Winchester
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Contralateral breast cancer: molecular differentiation between metastasis and second primary cancer.

Authors:  E Janschek; D Kandioler-Eckersberger; C Ludwig; S Kappel; B Wolf; S Taucher; M Rudas; M Gnant; R Jakesz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Tari A King; Rita Sakr; Sujata Patil; Inga Gurevich; Michelle Stempel; Michelle Sampson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Association between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer outcomes by hormone receptor status.

Authors:  Abenaa M Brewster; Isabelle Bedrosian; Patricia A Parker; Wenli Dong; Susan K Peterson; Scott B Cantor; Melissa Crosby; Yu Shen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  John A Murphy; Thomas D Milner; Joseph M O'Donoghue
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Trends in the use of bilateral mastectomy in England from 2002 to 2011: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  Jenny Neuburger; Fiona Macneill; Ranjeet Jeevan; Jan H P van der Meulen; David A Cromwell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  8 in total

1.  Emerging trends in surgical and adjuvant radiation therapies among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Oyewale O Shiyanbola; Brian L Sprague; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Sally Herschorn; Ronald E Gangnon; Donald L Weaver; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  What does risk of future cancer mean to breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Karen Kaiser; Kenzie A Cameron; Jennifer Beaumont; Sofia F Garcia; Leilani Lacson; Margaret Moran; Lindsey Karavites; Chiara Rodgers; Swati Kulkarni; Nora M Hansen; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Bilateral Mastectomy for Unilateral Breast Cancer: a Perplexing Trend.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 4.  Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora E Carbine; Liz Lostumbo; Judi Wallace; Henry Ko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

5.  Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Data on CPM Outcomes and Risks.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Deanna J Attai; Steven L Chen; Hiram S Cody; Jill R Dietz; Sheldon M Feldman; Caprice C Greenberg; Rena B Kass; Jeffrey Landercasper; Valerie Lemaine; Fiona MacNeill; David H Song; Alicia C Staley; Lee G Wilke; Shawna C Willey; Katharine A Yao; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Social Network, Surgeon, and Media Influence on the Decision to Undergo Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.

Authors:  Maria K Venetis; Erina L MacGeorge; Dadrie F Baptiste; Ashton Mouton; Lorin B Friley; Rebekah Pastor; Kristen Hatten; Janaka Lagoo; Monet W Bowling; Susan E Clare
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.339

7.  Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons' Knowledge and Comfort of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Carrie A Houssock; Sheri S Slezak; Emily Bellavance
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Surgical Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Berger; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.