Literature DB >> 25301017

Orientation-sensitivity to facial features explains the Thatcher illusion.

Lilia Psalta1, Andrew W Young1, Peter Thompson1, Timothy J Andrews1.   

Abstract

The Thatcher illusion provides a compelling example of the perceptual cost of face inversion. The Thatcher illusion is often thought to result from a disruption to the processing of spatial relations between face features. Here, we show the limitations of this account and instead demonstrate that the effect of inversion in the Thatcher illusion is better explained by a disruption to the processing of purely local facial features. Using a matching task, we found that participants were able to discriminate normal and Thatcherized versions of the same face when they were presented in an upright orientation, but not when the images were inverted. Next, we showed that the effect of inversion was also apparent when only the eye region or only the mouth region was visible. These results demonstrate that a key component of the Thatcher illusion is to be found in orientation-specific encoding of the expressive features (eyes and mouth) of the face.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thatcher illusion; expression; face; inversion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301017      PMCID: PMC4191594          DOI: 10.1167/14.12.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  26 in total

1.  When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 2.  The early development of face processing--what makes faces special?

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Stefanie Peykarjou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 3.  Understanding person perception.

Authors:  Andrew W Young; Vicki Bruce
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2011-06-23

4.  Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.

Authors:  G Rhodes
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces.

Authors:  S Carey; R Diamond
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Inversion and configuration of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J Searcy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.

Authors:  Luc Boutsen; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-08

9.  Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical representations of facial expression in the human brain.

Authors:  Richard J Harris; Andrew W Young; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The Thatcher illusion reveals orientation dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial expressions.

Authors:  Lilia Psalta; Andrew W Young; Peter Thompson; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.