Literature DB >> 25301016

Dealing with delays does not transfer across sensorimotor tasks.

Cristina de la Malla1, Joan López-Moliner1, Eli Brenner2.   

Abstract

It is known that people can learn to deal with delays between their actions and the consequences of such actions. We wondered whether they do so by adjusting their anticipations about the sensory consequences of their actions or whether they simply learn to move in certain ways when performing specific tasks. To find out, we examined details of how people learn to intercept a moving target with a cursor that follows the hand with a delay and examined the transfer of learning between this task and various other tasks that require temporal precision. Subjects readily learned to intercept the moving target with the delayed cursor. The compensation for the delay generalized across modifications of the task, so subjects did not simply learn to move in a certain way in specific circumstances. The compensation did not generalize to completely different timing tasks, so subjects did not generally expect the consequences of their motor commands to be delayed. We conclude that people specifically learn to control the delayed visual consequences of their actions to perform certain tasks.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; delays; interception; learning; timing; transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25301016     DOI: 10.1167/14.12.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  10 in total

1.  Hitting moving targets with a continuously changing temporal window.

Authors:  Cristina de la Malla; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand vision.

Authors:  Elie Cattan; Pascal Perrier; François Bérard; Silvain Gerber; Amélie Rochet-Capellan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Raz Leib; Assaf Pressman; Lucia S Simo; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-26

4.  Eye movements in interception with delayed visual feedback.

Authors:  Clara Cámara; Cristina de la Malla; Joan López-Moliner; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Increased error-correction leads to both higher levels of variability and adaptation.

Authors:  Elisabeth B Knelange; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prediction and final temporal errors are used for trial-to-trial motor corrections.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Cécile Vullings; Laurent Madelain; Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Looking away from a moving target does not disrupt the way in which the movement toward the target is guided.

Authors:  Clara Cámara; Joan López-Moliner; Eli Brenner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Motion-in-depth effects on interceptive timing errors in an immersive environment.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Temporal perturbations cause movement-context independent but modality specific sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nadine Schlichting; Tatiana Kartashova; Michael Wiesing; Eckart Zimmermann
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Decreased Temporal Sensorimotor Adaptation Due to Perturbation-Induced Measurement Noise.

Authors:  Elisabeth B Knelange; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.