BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: WARCEF randomized 2,305 patients in sinus rhythm withejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% to warfarin (INR 2.0-3.5) or aspirin 325 mg. Warfarin reduced the incident ischemic stroke (IIS) hazard rate by 48% over aspirin in a secondary analysis. The IIS rate in heart failure (HF) is too low to warrant routine anticoagulation but epidemiologic studies show that prior stroke increases the stroke risk in HF. In this study, we explore IIS rates in WARCEF patients with and without baseline stroke to look for risk factors for IIS and determine if a subgroup with an IIS rate high enough to give a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction can be identified. METHODS: We compared potential stroke risk factors between patients with baseline stroke and those without using the exact conditional score test for Poisson variables. We looked for risk factors for IIS, by comparing IIS rates between different risk factors. For EF we tried cut-off points of 10, 15 and 20%. The cut-off point 15% was used as it was the highest EF that was associated with a significant increase in IIS rate. IIS and EF strata were balanced as to warfarin/aspirin assignment by the stratified randomized design. A multiple Poisson regression examined the simultaneous effects of all risk factors on IIS rate. IIS rates per hundred patient years (/100 PY) were calculated in patient groups with significant risk factors. Missing values were assigned the modal value. RESULTS:Twenty of 248 (8.1%) patients with baseline stroke and 64 of 2,048 (3.1%) without had IIS. IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke (2.37/100 PY) was greater than patients without (0.89/100 PY) (rate ratio 2.68, p < 0.001). Fourteen of 219 (6.4%) patients with ejection fraction (EF) <15% and 70 of 2,079 (3.4%) with EF ≥ 15% had IIS. In the multiple regression analysis stroke at baseline (p < 0.001) and EF <15% vs. ≥ 15% (p = 0.005) remained significant predictors of IIS. IIS rate was 2.04/100 PY in patients with EF <15% and 0.95/100 PY in patients with EF ≥ 15% (p = 0.009). IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke and reduced EF was 5.88/100 PY with EF <15% decreasing to 2.62/100 PY with EF <30%. CONCLUSIONS: In a WARCEF exploratory analysis, prior stroke and EF <15% were risk factors for IIS. Further research is needed to determine if a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction is obtainable with warfarin in HF patients with prior stroke and reduced EF.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:WARCEF randomized 2,305 patients in sinus rhythm with ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% to warfarin (INR 2.0-3.5) or aspirin 325 mg. Warfarin reduced the incident ischemic stroke (IIS) hazard rate by 48% over aspirin in a secondary analysis. The IIS rate in heart failure (HF) is too low to warrant routine anticoagulation but epidemiologic studies show that prior stroke increases the stroke risk in HF. In this study, we explore IIS rates in WARCEFpatients with and without baseline stroke to look for risk factors for IIS and determine if a subgroup with an IIS rate high enough to give a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction can be identified. METHODS: We compared potential stroke risk factors between patients with baseline stroke and those without using the exact conditional score test for Poisson variables. We looked for risk factors for IIS, by comparing IIS rates between different risk factors. For EF we tried cut-off points of 10, 15 and 20%. The cut-off point 15% was used as it was the highest EF that was associated with a significant increase in IIS rate. IIS and EF strata were balanced as to warfarin/aspirin assignment by the stratified randomized design. A multiple Poisson regression examined the simultaneous effects of all risk factors on IIS rate. IIS rates per hundred patient years (/100 PY) were calculated in patient groups with significant risk factors. Missing values were assigned the modal value. RESULTS: Twenty of 248 (8.1%) patients with baseline stroke and 64 of 2,048 (3.1%) without had IIS. IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke (2.37/100 PY) was greater than patients without (0.89/100 PY) (rate ratio 2.68, p < 0.001). Fourteen of 219 (6.4%) patients with ejection fraction (EF) <15% and 70 of 2,079 (3.4%) with EF ≥ 15% had IIS. In the multiple regression analysis stroke at baseline (p < 0.001) and EF <15% vs. ≥ 15% (p = 0.005) remained significant predictors of IIS. IIS rate was 2.04/100 PY in patients with EF <15% and 0.95/100 PY in patients with EF ≥ 15% (p = 0.009). IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke and reduced EF was 5.88/100 PY with EF <15% decreasing to 2.62/100 PY with EF <30%. CONCLUSIONS: In a WARCEF exploratory analysis, prior stroke and EF <15% were risk factors for IIS. Further research is needed to determine if a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction is obtainable with warfarin in HF patients with prior stroke and reduced EF.
Authors: Brandi J Witt; Robert D Brown; Steven J Jacobsen; Susan A Weston; Karla V Ballman; Ryan A Meverden; Véronique L Roger Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Shunichi Homma; John L P Thompson; Patrick M Pullicino; Bruce Levin; Ronald S Freudenberger; John R Teerlink; Susan E Ammon; Susan Graham; Ralph L Sacco; Douglas L Mann; J P Mohr; Barry M Massie; Arthur J Labovitz; Stefan D Anker; Dirk J Lok; Piotr Ponikowski; Conrado J Estol; Gregory Y H Lip; Marco R Di Tullio; Alexandra R Sanford; Vilma Mejia; Andre P Gabriel; Mirna L del Valle; Richard Buchsbaum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Barry M Massie; Joseph F Collins; Susan E Ammon; Paul W Armstrong; John G F Cleland; Michael Ezekowitz; Syed M Jafri; William F Krol; Christopher M O'Connor; Kevin A Schulman; Koon Teo; Stuart R Warren Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Karen L Furie; Larry B Goldstein; Gregory W Albers; Pooja Khatri; Ron Neyens; Mintu P Turakhia; Tanya N Turan; Kathryn A Wood Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Daniel E Singer; Yuchiao Chang; Margaret C Fang; Leila H Borowsky; Niela K Pomernacki; Natalia Udaltsova; Alan S Go Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brian Mac Grory; Shadi Yaghi; Charlotte Cordonnier; Luciano A Sposato; Jose G Romano; Seemant Chaturvedi Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: Omar Saeed; Shuaiqi Zhang; Snehal R Patel; Ulrich P Jorde; Mario J Garcia; Nurilign Bulcha; Tanush Gupta; Ying Xian; Roland Matsouaka; Shreyansh Shah; Eric E Smith; Lee H Schwamm; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 6.592
Authors: Jin Man Jung; Yong Hyun Kim; Sungwook Yu; Kyungmi O; Chi Kyung Kim; Tae Jin Song; Yong Jae Kim; Bum Joon Kim; Sung Hyuk Heo; Kwang Yeol Park; Jeong Min Kim; Jong Ho Park; Jay Chol Choi; Man Seok Park; Joon Tae Kim; Kang Ho Choi; Yang Ha Hwang; Jong Won Chung; Oh Young Bang; Gyeong Moon Kim; Woo Keun Seo Journal: J Clin Neurol Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Jerzy Paluszkiewicz; Hendrik Milting; Marta Kałużna-Oleksy; Małgorzata Pyda; Magdalena Janus; Hermann Körperich; Misagh Piran Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-07-16 Impact factor: 4.964