Literature DB >> 25300706

Recurrent stroke in the warfarin versus aspirin in reduced cardiac ejection fraction (WARCEF) trial.

Patrick M Pullicino1, Min Qian, Ralph L Sacco, Ron Freudenberger, Susan Graham, John R Teerlink, Douglas Mann, Marco R Di Tullio, Piotr Ponikowski, Dirk J Lok, Stefan D Anker, Gregory Y H Lip, Conrado J Estol, Bruce Levin, Jay P Mohr, John L P Thompson, Shunichi Homma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: WARCEF randomized 2,305 patients in sinus rhythm with ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% to warfarin (INR 2.0-3.5) or aspirin 325 mg. Warfarin reduced the incident ischemic stroke (IIS) hazard rate by 48% over aspirin in a secondary analysis. The IIS rate in heart failure (HF) is too low to warrant routine anticoagulation but epidemiologic studies show that prior stroke increases the stroke risk in HF. In this study, we explore IIS rates in WARCEF patients with and without baseline stroke to look for risk factors for IIS and determine if a subgroup with an IIS rate high enough to give a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction can be identified.
METHODS: We compared potential stroke risk factors between patients with baseline stroke and those without using the exact conditional score test for Poisson variables. We looked for risk factors for IIS, by comparing IIS rates between different risk factors. For EF we tried cut-off points of 10, 15 and 20%. The cut-off point 15% was used as it was the highest EF that was associated with a significant increase in IIS rate. IIS and EF strata were balanced as to warfarin/aspirin assignment by the stratified randomized design. A multiple Poisson regression examined the simultaneous effects of all risk factors on IIS rate. IIS rates per hundred patient years (/100 PY) were calculated in patient groups with significant risk factors. Missing values were assigned the modal value.
RESULTS: Twenty of 248 (8.1%) patients with baseline stroke and 64 of 2,048 (3.1%) without had IIS. IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke (2.37/100 PY) was greater than patients without (0.89/100 PY) (rate ratio 2.68, p < 0.001). Fourteen of 219 (6.4%) patients with ejection fraction (EF) <15% and 70 of 2,079 (3.4%) with EF ≥ 15% had IIS. In the multiple regression analysis stroke at baseline (p < 0.001) and EF <15% vs. ≥ 15% (p = 0.005) remained significant predictors of IIS. IIS rate was 2.04/100 PY in patients with EF <15% and 0.95/100 PY in patients with EF ≥ 15% (p = 0.009). IIS rate in patients with baseline stroke and reduced EF was 5.88/100 PY with EF <15% decreasing to 2.62/100 PY with EF <30%.
CONCLUSIONS: In a WARCEF exploratory analysis, prior stroke and EF <15% were risk factors for IIS. Further research is needed to determine if a clinically relevant stroke risk reduction is obtainable with warfarin in HF patients with prior stroke and reduced EF.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25300706      PMCID: PMC4245504          DOI: 10.1159/000365502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  13 in total

1.  Warfarin in heart failure.

Authors:  John W Eikelboom; Stuart J Connolly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R G Hart; O Benavente; R McBride; L A Pearce
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Evaluation of patients' attitudes towards stroke prevention and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S Lahaye; S Regpala; S Lacombe; M Sharma; S Gibbens; D Ball; K Francis
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Ischemic stroke after heart failure: a community-based study.

Authors:  Brandi J Witt; Robert D Brown; Steven J Jacobsen; Susan A Weston; Karla V Ballman; Ryan A Meverden; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Warfarin and aspirin in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Shunichi Homma; John L P Thompson; Patrick M Pullicino; Bruce Levin; Ronald S Freudenberger; John R Teerlink; Susan E Ammon; Susan Graham; Ralph L Sacco; Douglas L Mann; J P Mohr; Barry M Massie; Arthur J Labovitz; Stefan D Anker; Dirk J Lok; Piotr Ponikowski; Conrado J Estol; Gregory Y H Lip; Marco R Di Tullio; Alexandra R Sanford; Vilma Mejia; Andre P Gabriel; Mirna L del Valle; Richard Buchsbaum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Ejection fraction and risk of thromboembolic events in patients with systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm: evidence for gender differences in the studies of left ventricular dysfunction trials.

Authors:  D L Dries; Y D Rosenberg; M A Waclawiw; M J Domanski
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Randomized trial of warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with chronic heart failure: the Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) trial.

Authors:  Barry M Massie; Joseph F Collins; Susan E Ammon; Paul W Armstrong; John G F Cleland; Michael Ezekowitz; Syed M Jafri; William F Krol; Christopher M O'Connor; Kevin A Schulman; Koon Teo; Stuart R Warren
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Noninvasive cardiac monitoring for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter after acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joy Liao; Zahira Khalid; Ciaran Scallan; Carlos Morillo; Martin O'Donnell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Oral antithrombotic agents for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a science advisory for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  Karen L Furie; Larry B Goldstein; Gregory W Albers; Pooja Khatri; Ron Neyens; Mintu P Turakhia; Tanya N Turan; Kathryn A Wood
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  The net clinical benefit of warfarin anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Daniel E Singer; Yuchiao Chang; Margaret C Fang; Leila H Borowsky; Niela K Pomernacki; Natalia Udaltsova; Alan S Go
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Cardioembolic Stroke.

Authors:  Hooman Kamel; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Potential new uses of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants to treat and prevent stroke.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Hooman Kamel; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Advances in Recurrent Stroke Prevention: Focus on Antithrombotic Therapies.

Authors:  Brian Mac Grory; Shadi Yaghi; Charlotte Cordonnier; Luciano A Sposato; Jose G Romano; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 23.213

4.  Oral Anticoagulation and Adverse Outcomes after Ischemic Stroke in Heart Failure Patients without Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Omar Saeed; Shuaiqi Zhang; Snehal R Patel; Ulrich P Jorde; Mario J Garcia; Nurilign Bulcha; Tanush Gupta; Ying Xian; Roland Matsouaka; Shreyansh Shah; Eric E Smith; Lee H Schwamm; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.592

Review 5.  Heart Failure and Stroke.

Authors:  Katja Schumacher; Jelena Kornej; Eduard Shantsila; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-10

6.  Long-Term Outcomes of Real-World Korean Patients with Atrial-Fibrillation-Related Stroke and Severely Decreased Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Jin Man Jung; Yong Hyun Kim; Sungwook Yu; Kyungmi O; Chi Kyung Kim; Tae Jin Song; Yong Jae Kim; Bum Joon Kim; Sung Hyuk Heo; Kwang Yeol Park; Jeong Min Kim; Jong Ho Park; Jay Chol Choi; Man Seok Park; Joon Tae Kim; Kang Ho Choi; Yang Ha Hwang; Jong Won Chung; Oh Young Bang; Gyeong Moon Kim; Woo Keun Seo
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 7.  Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Cardiomyopathy-Still More Questions than Answers.

Authors:  Jerzy Paluszkiewicz; Hendrik Milting; Marta Kałużna-Oleksy; Małgorzata Pyda; Magdalena Janus; Hermann Körperich; Misagh Piran
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Secondary stroke prevention: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Charles Esenwa; Jose Gutierrez
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2015-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.