Literature DB >> 19289640

Randomized trial of warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with chronic heart failure: the Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure (WATCH) trial.

Barry M Massie1, Joseph F Collins, Susan E Ammon, Paul W Armstrong, John G F Cleland, Michael Ezekowitz, Syed M Jafri, William F Krol, Christopher M O'Connor, Kevin A Schulman, Koon Teo, Stuart R Warren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity. The role of antithrombotic therapy in patients with chronic heart failure has long been debated. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal antithrombotic agent for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fractions who are in sinus rhythm. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This prospective, randomized clinical trial of open-label warfarin (target international normalized ratio of 2.5 to 3.0) and double-blind treatment with either aspirin (162 mg once daily) or clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) had a 30-month enrollment period and a minimum of 12 months of treatment. We enrolled 1587 men and women >/=18 years of age with symptomatic heart failure for at least 3 months who were in sinus rhythm and had left ventricular ejection fraction of </=35%. The primary outcome was the time to first occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. For the primary composite end point, the hazard ratios were as follows: for warfarin versus aspirin, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.12; P=0.77); for clopidogrel versus aspirin, 1.08 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.40; P=0.57); and for warfarin versus clopidogrel, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.16; P=0.39). Warfarin was associated with fewer nonfatal strokes than aspirin or clopidogrel. Hospitalization for worsening heart failure occurred in 116 (22.2%), 97 (18.5%), and 89 (16.5%) patients treated with aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin, respectively (P=0.02 for warfarin versus aspirin).
CONCLUSIONS: The primary outcome measure and the mortality data do not support the primary hypotheses that warfarin is superior to aspirin and that clopidogrel is superior to aspirin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19289640     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.801753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  98 in total

1.  Aspirin Does Not Increase Heart Failure Events in Heart Failure Patients: From the WARCEF Trial.

Authors:  John R Teerlink; Min Qian; Natalie A Bello; Ronald S Freudenberger; Bruce Levin; Marco R Di Tullio; Susan Graham; Douglas L Mann; Ralph L Sacco; J P Mohr; Gregory Y H Lip; Arthur J Labovitz; Seitetz C Lee; Piotr Ponikowski; Dirk J Lok; Stefan D Anker; John L P Thompson; Shunichi Homma
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 12.035

Review 2.  Prevention of cardioembolic stroke.

Authors:  William David Freeman; Maria I Aguilar
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Identifying a high stroke risk subgroup in individuals with heart failure.

Authors:  Patrick M Pullicino; Leslie A McClure; Virginia J Howard; Virginia G Wadley; Monika M Safford; James F Meschia; Aaron Anderson; George Howard; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  Anticoagulation versus placebo for heart failure in sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Eduard Shantsila
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-28

5.  A clinical method for mapping and quantifying blood stasis in the left ventricle.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rossini; Pablo Martinez-Legazpi; Vi Vu; Leticia Fernández-Friera; Candelas Pérez Del Villar; Sara Rodríguez-López; Yolanda Benito; María-Guadalupe Borja; David Pastor-Escuredo; Raquel Yotti; María J Ledesma-Carbayo; Andrew M Kahn; Borja Ibáñez; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Karen May-Newman; Javier Bermejo; Juan C Del Álamo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Warfarin use and outcomes in patients with advanced chronic systolic heart failure without atrial fibrillation, prior thromboembolic events, or prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Marjan Mujib; Abu-Ahmed Z Rahman; Ravi V Desai; Mustafa I Ahmed; Margaret A Feller; Inmaculada Aban; Thomas E Love; Michel White; Prakash Deedwania; Wilbert S Aronow; Gregg Fonarow; Ali Ahmed
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Atherosclerotic disease of the abdominal aorta and its branches: prognostic implications in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Christos V Bourantas; Huan P Loh; Nasser Sherwi; Ann C Tweddel; Ramesh de Silva; Elena I Lukaschuk; Antony Nicholson; Alan S Rigby; Simon D Thackray; Duncan F Ettles; Nikolay P Nikitin; Andrew L Clark; John G F Cleland
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  Interactions between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Stefano Urbinati; Enrica Perugini; Simona Gambetti
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  Safety and efficacy of new anticoagulants in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Ron Pisters; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-03

Review 10.  Top practice-changing articles over the last two years.

Authors:  Scott Kaatz; Brian F Gage
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.