Literature DB >> 25300018

On the feasibility of measuring urban air pollution by wireless distributed sensor networks.

Sharon Moltchanov1, Ilan Levy1, Yael Etzion1, Uri Lerner1, David M Broday2, Barak Fishbain1.   

Abstract

Accurate evaluation of air pollution on human-wellbeing requires high-resolution measurements. Standard air quality monitoring stations provide accurate pollution levels but due to their sparse distribution they cannot capture the highly resolved spatial variations within cities. Similarly, dedicated field campaigns can use tens of measurement devices and obtain highly dense spatial coverage but normally deployment has been limited to short periods of no more than few weeks. Nowadays, advances in communication and sensory technologies enable the deployment of dense grids of wireless distributed air monitoring nodes, yet their sensor ability to capture the spatiotemporal pollutant variability at the sub-neighborhood scale has never been thoroughly tested. This study reports ambient measurements of gaseous air pollutants by a network of six wireless multi-sensor miniature nodes that have been deployed in three urban sites, about 150 m apart. We demonstrate the network's capability to capture spatiotemporal concentration variations at an exceptional fine resolution but highlight the need for a frequent in-situ calibration to maintain the consistency of some sensors. Accordingly, a procedure for a field calibration is proposed and shown to improve the system's performance. Overall, our results support the compatibility of wireless distributed sensor networks for measuring urban air pollution at a sub-neighborhood spatial resolution, which suits the requirement for highly spatiotemporal resolved measurements at the breathing-height when assessing exposure to urban air pollution.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality monitoring; Exposure; Urban air pollution; Wireless distributed sensor network

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25300018     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  30 in total

1.  Developing air exchange rate models by evaluating vehicle in-cabin air pollutant exposures in a highway and tunnel setting: case study of Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Nayeb Yazdi; Mohammad Arhami; Maryam Delavarrafiee; Mehdi Ketabchy
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mapping Occupational Hazards with a Multi-sensor Network in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility.

Authors:  Christopher Zuidema; Sinan Sousan; Larissa V Stebounova; Alyson Gray; Xiaoxing Liu; Marcus Tatum; Oliver Stroh; Geb Thomas; Thomas Peters; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  Wan Jiao; Gayle Hagler; Ronald Williams; Robert Sharpe; Ryan Brown; Daniel Garver; Robert Judge; Motria Caudill; Joshua Rickard; Michael Davis; Lewis Weinstock; Susan Zimmer-Dauphinee; Ken Buckley
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Air Quality Sensors and Data Adjustment Algorithms: When Is It No Longer a Measurement?

Authors:  Gayle S W Hagler; Ronald Williams; Vasileios Papapostolou; Andrea Polidori
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Phong K Thai; Xiaoting Liu; Akwasi Asumadu-Sakyi; Godwin Ayoko; Alena Bartonova; Andrea Bedini; Fahe Chai; Bryce Christensen; Matthew Dunbabin; Jian Gao; Gayle S W Hagler; Rohan Jayaratne; Prashant Kumar; Alexis K H Lau; Peter K K Louie; Mandana Mazaheri; Zhi Ning; Nunzio Motta; Ben Mullins; Md Mahmudur Rahman; Zoran Ristovski; Mahnaz Shafiei; Dian Tjondronegoro; Dane Westerdahl; Ron Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Assessing a low-cost methane sensor quantification system for use in complex rural and urban environments.

Authors:  Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Joanna Gordon Casey; Ricardo Piedrahita; John Ortega; Hannah Halliday; Jill Johnston; Michael P Hannigan
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Information Theory Solution Approach to the Air Pollution Sensor Location-Allocation Problem.

Authors:  Ziv Mano; Shai Kendler; Barak Fishbain
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Using Gas-Phase Air Quality Sensors to Disentangle Potential Sources in a Los Angeles Neighborhood.

Authors:  Ashley Collier-Oxandale; Nicole Wong; Sandy Navarro; Jill Johnston; Michael Hannigan
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 9.  Towards an integrated framework for air quality monitoring and exposure estimation-a review.

Authors:  Savina Singla; Divya Bansal; Archan Misra; Gaurav Raheja
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Assessment of PM2.5 Exposure during Cycle Trips in The Netherlands Using Low-Cost Sensors.

Authors:  Joost Wesseling; Wouter Hendricx; Henri de Ruiter; Sjoerd van Ratingen; Derko Drukker; Maaike Huitema; Claar Schouwenaar; Geert Janssen; Stephen van Aken; Jan Willem Smeenk; Arjen Hof; Erik Tielemans
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.