Literature DB >> 30715121

Mapping Occupational Hazards with a Multi-sensor Network in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility.

Christopher Zuidema1, Sinan Sousan2,3,4, Larissa V Stebounova4, Alyson Gray4, Xiaoxing Liu5,6, Marcus Tatum6, Oliver Stroh6, Geb Thomas6, Thomas Peters4, Kirsten Koehler1.   

Abstract

Due to their small size, low-power demands, and customizability, low-cost sensors can be deployed in collections that are spatially distributed in the environment, known as sensor networks. The literature contains examples of such networks in the ambient environment; this article describes the development and deployment of a 40-node multi-hazard network, constructed with low-cost sensors for particulate matter (SHARP GP2Y1010AU0F), carbon monoxide (Alphasense CO-B4), oxidizing gases (Alphasense OX-B421), and noise (developed in-house) in a heavy-vehicle manufacturing facility. Network nodes communicated wirelessly with a central database in order to record hazard measurements at 5-min intervals. Here, we report on the temporal and spatial measurements from the network, precision of network measurements, and accuracy of network measurements with respect to field reference instruments through 8 months of continuous deployment. During typical production periods, 1-h mean hazard levels ± standard deviation across all monitors for particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), oxidizing gases (OX), and noise were 0.62 ± 0.2 mg m-3, 7 ± 2 ppm, 155 ± 58 ppb, and 82 ± 1 dBA, respectively. We observed clear diurnal and weekly temporal patterns for all hazards and daily, hazard-specific spatial patterns attributable to general manufacturing processes in the facility. Processes associated with the highest hazard levels were machining and welding (PM and noise), staging (CO), and manual and robotic welding (OX). Network sensors exhibited varying degrees of precision with 95% of measurements among three collocated nodes within 0.21 mg m-3 for PM, 0.4 ppm for CO, 9 ppb for OX, and 1 dBA for noise of each other. The median percent bias with reference to direct-reading instruments was 27%, 11%, 45%, and 1%, for PM, CO, OX, and noise, respectively. This study demonstrates the successful long-term deployment of a multi-hazard sensor network in an industrial manufacturing setting and illustrates the high temporal and spatial resolution of hazard data that sensor and monitor networks are capable of. We show that network-derived hazard measurements offer rich datasets to comprehensively assess occupational hazards. Our network sets the stage for the characterization of occupational exposures on the individual level with wireless sensor networks.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air quality monitoring network; carbon monoxide; hazard mapping; internet of things; nitrogen dioxide; noise; ozone; particulate matter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30715121      PMCID: PMC7182772          DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxy111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health        ISSN: 2398-7308            Impact factor:   2.179


  41 in total

1.  Mapping particulate matter at the body weld department in an automobile assembly plant.

Authors:  Sa Liu; S Katharine Hammond
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Determination of particle concentration rankings by spatial mapping of particle surface area, number, and mass concentrations in a restaurant and a die casting plant.

Authors:  Ji Young Park; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Peter C Raynor; Gregory M Olson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  On the use of small and cheaper sensors and devices for indicative citizen-based monitoring of respirable particulate matter.

Authors:  Milena Jovašević-Stojanović; Alena Bartonova; Dušan Topalović; Ivan Lazović; Boris Pokrić; Zoran Ristovski
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 4.  Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Douglas W Dockery
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Prospects and pitfalls of occupational hazard mapping: 'between these lines there be dragons'.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-09-13

6.  The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities.

Authors:  Prashant Kumar; Lidia Morawska; Claudio Martani; George Biskos; Marina Neophytou; Silvana Di Sabatino; Margaret Bell; Leslie Norford; Rex Britter
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 7.  Clearing the air: a review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health.

Authors:  Jonathan O Anderson; Josef G Thundiyil; Andrew Stolbach
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-06

8.  Autocorrelation and variability of indoor air quality measurements.

Authors:  M Luoma; S A Batterman
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

9.  Epidemiologic study design for investigating respiratory health effects of complex air pollution mixtures.

Authors:  D W Dockery
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Low-Cost, Distributed Environmental Monitors for Factory Worker Health.

Authors:  Geb W Thomas; Sinan Sousan; Marcus Tatum; Xiaoxing Liu; Christopher Zuidema; Mitchell Fitzpatrick; Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sources of error and variability in particulate matter sensor network measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Zuidema; Larissa V Stebounova; Sinan Sousan; Geb Thomas; Kirsten Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network.

Authors:  Misti Levy Zamora; Colby Buehler; Hao Lei; Abhirup Datta; Fulizi Xiong; Drew R Gentner; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  ACS ES T Eng       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 3.  Evolution and Applications of Recent Sensing Technology for Occupational Risk Assessment: A Rapid Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Giacomo Fanti; Andrea Spinazzè; Francesca Borghi; Sabrina Rovelli; Davide Campagnolo; Marta Keller; Andrea Borghi; Andrea Cattaneo; Emanuele Cauda; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Estimating personal exposures from a multi-hazard sensor network.

Authors:  Christopher Zuidema; Larissa V Stebounova; Sinan Sousan; Alyson Gray; Oliver Stroh; Geb Thomas; Thomas Peters; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.563

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.