Literature DB >> 25299703

Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system.

S Gurgan, Z B Kutuk, E Ergin, S S Oztas, F Y Cakir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system compared with a microfilled hybrid posterior composite in a four-year randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: A total of 140 (80 Class 1 and 60 Class 2) lesions in 59 patients were either restored with a glass ionomer restorative system (Equia, GC, Tokyo, Japan), which was a combination of a packable glass ionomer (Equia Fil, GC) and a self-adhesive nanofilled coating (Equia Coat, GC), or with a microfilled hybrid composite (Gradia Direct Posterior, GC) in combination with a self-etch adhesive (G-Bond, GC) by two experienced operators according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two independent examiners evaluated the restorations at baseline and at one, two, three, and four years postrestoration according to the modified US Public Health Service criteria. Polyvinyl siloxane impression negative replicas at each recall were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate surface characteristics. The statistical analyses were carried out with McNemar, Pearson Chi-square, and Cochran Q-tests (p<0.05).
RESULTS: After four years, 126 (76 Class 1 and 50 Class 2) restorations were evaluated in 52 patients, with a recall rate of 88.1%. None of the restorations showed trends to downgrade in anatomical form, secondary caries, surface texture, postoperative sensitivity, and color match (p>0.05). Significant differences in marginal adaptation and discoloration were found at four years compared to baseline for both restorative materials for Class 1 and Class 2 restorations (p<0.05). Only one Class 2 Equia restoration was missing at three years (3.9%), and another one was missing at four years (7.7%) (p>0.05). SEM evaluations were in accordance with the clinical findings.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of both materials for the restoration of posterior teeth exhibited a similar and clinically successful performance after four years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25299703     DOI: 10.2341/13-239-C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  19 in total

1.  Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Esra Ergin; Sema Seval Oztas; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.

Authors:  Philippe Francois; Elsa Vennat; Stéphane Le Goff; Nathalie Ruscassier; Jean-Pierre Attal; Elisabeth Dursun
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.

Authors:  Maria D Gaintantzopoulou; Vellore K Gopinath; Spiros Zinelis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Three-year survival of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations in people with disability.

Authors:  Gustavo F Molina; Denise Faulks; Ignacio Mazzola; Ricardo J Cabral; Jan Mulder; Jo E Frencken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  Márcia Rezende; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jadson Araújo da Silva; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  In vitro abrasion of resin-coated highly viscous glass ionomer cements: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.

Authors:  Özgur Kanik; L Sebnem Turkun; Walter Dasch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Clinical study on resin composite and glass ionomer materials in II class restorations in permanent teeth.

Authors:  Piotr Rożniatowski; Emil Korporowicz; Dariusz Gozdowski; Dorota Olczak-Kowalczyk
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-02-01

8.  Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field.

Authors:  Thomas Klinke; Amro Daboul; Anita Turek; Roland Frankenberger; Reinhard Hickel; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Cavity Adaptation of Water-Based Restoratives Placed as Liners under a Resin Composite.

Authors:  Sheela B Abraham; Maria D Gaintantzopoulou; George Eliades
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-03-30

10.  Glass hybrid restorations as an alternative for restoring hypomineralized molars in the ART model.

Authors:  Juliana de Aguiar Grossi; Renata Nunes Cabral; Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Soraya Coelho Leal
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.