Sharon Lawn1, Yi Feng2, George Tsourtos2, Jonathan Campion3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia sharon.lawn@flinders.edu.au. 2. Discipline of Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 3. Bethlem Royal Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK Department of Population Mental Health, University College London, UCL Partners, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The original audit on which this 2013 secondary analysis is based, was conducted in 2010. It explored implementation of smoke-free policies from the perspective of unit managers in 147 psychiatric units across England comprising a randomly selected sample of nine different unit types. MATERIAL: Two main themes are presented: positive perspectives of smoke-free policy implementation, and barriers and problems with smoke-free policy implementation. Analysis of unit managers' experiences and perspectives found that 96% of participants thought smoke-free policy had achieved positive outcomes for staff, patients, services and care. DISCUSSION: Consistency of response was the most prominent factor associated with policy success. Quality of the physical environment and care delivery were clear positive outcomes which enabled the environment to be more conducive to supporting staffs' and patients' quit attempts. Lack of consistency and a prevailing culture of acceptance of smoking were identified as some of the most reported perceived continuing problems. Solutions included the need to acknowledge that this type of complex systems change takes time and ongoing staff education and training. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the importance of taking into account the experiences and attitudes of staff responsible for enacting smoke-free policy.
BACKGROUND: The original audit on which this 2013 secondary analysis is based, was conducted in 2010. It explored implementation of smoke-free policies from the perspective of unit managers in 147 psychiatric units across England comprising a randomly selected sample of nine different unit types. MATERIAL: Two main themes are presented: positive perspectives of smoke-free policy implementation, and barriers and problems with smoke-free policy implementation. Analysis of unit managers' experiences and perspectives found that 96% of participants thought smoke-free policy had achieved positive outcomes for staff, patients, services and care. DISCUSSION: Consistency of response was the most prominent factor associated with policy success. Quality of the physical environment and care delivery were clear positive outcomes which enabled the environment to be more conducive to supporting staffs' and patients' quit attempts. Lack of consistency and a prevailing culture of acceptance of smoking were identified as some of the most reported perceived continuing problems. Solutions included the need to acknowledge that this type of complex systems change takes time and ongoing staff education and training. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the importance of taking into account the experiences and attitudes of staff responsible for enacting smoke-free policy.
Authors: Julia M Lappin; Dennis Thomas; Jackie Curtis; Stephen Blowfield; Mike Gatsi; Gareth Marr; Ryan Courtney Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 2.430