Literature DB >> 25297464

Performance of screening for aneuploidies by cell-free DNA analysis of maternal blood in twin pregnancies.

E Bevilacqua1, M M Gil, K H Nicolaides, E Ordoñez, V Cirigliano, H Dierickx, P J Willems, J C Jani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report clinical implementation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis of maternal blood in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancies and examine variables that could influence the failure rate of the test.
METHODS: cfDNA testing was performed in 515 twin pregnancies at 10-28 weeks' gestation. The failure rate of the test to provide results was compared with that in 1847 singleton pregnancies, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors among maternal and pregnancy characteristics were significant predictors of test failure.
RESULTS: Failure rate of the cfDNA test at first sampling was 1.7% in singletons and 5.6% in twins. Of those with a test result, the median fetal fraction in twins was 8.7% (range, 4.1-30.0%), which was lower than that in singletons (11.7% (range, 4.0-38.9%)). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that twin pregnancy, higher maternal weight and conception by in-vitro fertilization provided significant independent prediction of test failure. Follow-up was available in 351 (68.2%) of the twin pregnancies and comprised 334 with euploid fetuses, 12 discordant for trisomy 21 and five discordant for trisomy 18. In all 323 euploid cases with a result, the risk score for each trisomy was < 1:10 000. In 11 of the 12 cases with trisomy 21 and in the five with trisomy 18, the cfDNA test gave a high-risk result, but in one case of trisomy 21, the score was < 1:10 000.
CONCLUSION: In twin pregnancies screening by cfDNA testing is feasible, but the failure rate is higher and detection rate may be lower than in singletons.
Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  aneuploidies; cell-free DNA; screening test; trisomies; twin pregnancies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25297464     DOI: 10.1002/uog.14690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  15 in total

1.  Combined first trimester screen or noninvasive prenatal testing or both.

Authors:  Tony Yew Teck Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Sequencing of short cfDNA fragments in NIPT improves fetal fraction with higher maternal BMI and early gestational age.

Authors:  Longwei Qiao; Qin Zhang; Yuting Liang; Ang Gao; Yang Ding; Nannan Zhao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Yaojuan Lu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 4.  Cost-effectiveness of cell-free DNA in maternal blood testing for prenatal detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lidia García-Pérez; Renata Linertová; Margarita Álvarez-de-la-Rosa; Juan Carlos Bayón; Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia; Jorge Ferrer-Rodríguez; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12-16

5.  Utility of ultrasound examination at 10-14 weeks prior to cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  N L Vora; S Robinson; E E Hardisty; D M Stamilio
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 6.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

Review 7.  Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sian Taylor-Phillips; Karoline Freeman; Julia Geppert; Adeola Agbebiyi; Olalekan A Uthman; Jason Madan; Angus Clarke; Siobhan Quenby; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Performance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal chromosomal abnormalities in 1048 twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Yuan Cheng; Xinran Lu; Junxiang Tang; Jingran Li; Yuxiu Sun; Chaohong Wang; Jiansheng Zhu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non-invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13.

Authors:  A T Papageorghiou; A Khalil; M Forman; R Hulme; R Mazey; H A Mousa; E D Johnstone; A McKelvey; K E Cohen; M Risley; W Denman; B Kelly
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Aneuploidy screening by non-invasive prenatal testing in twin pregnancy.

Authors:  L Fosler; P Winters; K W Jones; K J Curnow; A J Sehnert; S Bhatt; L D Platt
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.