Literature DB >> 25296934

A comparison of the quality of care in accident and emergency departments in England and the Netherlands as experienced by patients.

Nanne Bos1,2, Ian J Seccombe3, Leontien M Sturms1,4, Rebecca Stellato1, Augustinus J P Schrijvers1, Henk F van Stel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measuring patients' experiences to determine health-care performance and quality of care from their perspective can provide valuable evidence for international improvements in the quality of care. We compare patients' experiences in Accident & Emergency departments (A&E) in England and the Netherlands and discuss the usefulness of this comparison.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients attending A&Es aged 18 years and older. In England, 134 A&Es were surveyed. In the Netherlands, nine hospitals participated in the study. Main outcome measures were patients' experiences represented by six domain scores aggregated on the country level or on the A&E level.
RESULTS: In England, 43 892 completed questionnaires were received (40%). In the Netherlands, 1865 completed questionnaires were received (42%). Three of six domain scores were significantly higher for patients in the Netherlands: 'waiting time' [mean scores of 73.8 (NL) versus 67.2 (ENG)], 'doctors and nurses' [mean scores of 85.7 (NL) versus 80.6 (ENG)] and 'your care and treatment' [mean scores of 82.6 (NL) and 80.2 (ENG)]. The variance among the English A&Es was large. The best and worst practices on five domains were English.
CONCLUSIONS: The mean quality of care in the A&E appeared to be better in the Netherlands on three domains, but the best practices were English A&Es. The within-country differences between A&Es were much larger than differences between countries. Healthcare performance in the A&E can be compared between countries by surveying patients' experiences, and there seems much to learn across A&Es both within and among countries.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  across-country comparison; emergency care; emergency service; hospital; patient satisfaction; patients’ experiences; quality indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25296934      PMCID: PMC5055240          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  16 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A simple approach to fairer hospital benchmarking using patient experience data.

Authors:  Barbara M Holzer; Christoph E Minder
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  How can quality of health care be safeguarded across the European Union?

Authors:  Helena Legido-Quigley; Martin McKee; Kieran Walshe; Rosa Suñol; Ellen Nolte; Niek Klazinga
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

4.  Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives.

Authors:  P D Cleary; S Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Insufficient cross-cultural adaptations and psychometric properties for many translated health assessment scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  Özgül Uysal-Bozkir; Juliette L Parlevliet; Sophia E de Rooij
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Measuring patients' experiences and views of the emergency and urgent care system: psychometric testing of the urgent care system questionnaire.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Emma Knowles; Jon Nicholl
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Waiting in the Accident and Emergency Department: Exploring Problematic Experiences.

Authors:  Nanne Bos; Henk van Stel; Augustinus Schrijvers; Leontien Sturms
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 8.  The Netherlands: health system review.

Authors:  Willemijn Schäfer; Madelon Kroneman; Wienke Boerma; Michael van den Berg; Gert Westert; Walter Devillé; Ewout van Ginneken
Journal:  Health Syst Transit       Date:  2010

9.  The accident and emergency department questionnaire: a measure for patients' experiences in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  Nanne Bos; Steve Sizmur; Chris Graham; Henk F van Stel
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  The discriminative power of patient experience surveys.

Authors:  Dolf de Boer; Diana Delnoij; Jany Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Measuring patient experience in the emergency department: A scoping review.

Authors:  Yemisi Okikiade Oyegbile; Petra Brysiewicz
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-08-13

2.  Patient's perspective on improving the quality of acute medical care: determining patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Marjolein N T Kremers; Tessel Zaalberg; Eva S van den Ende; Marlou van Beneden; Frits Holleman; Prabath W B Nanayakkara; Harm R Haak
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-09-29

3.  Analysis of the Experience-Based Design Feedback Data on a National Scale.

Authors:  Sakib Rahman; Deborah Thompson; Alice Clayton; Simon Conroy; Matt Tite
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-11-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.