Literature DB >> 25295531

An integrated bioimpedance--ECG gating technique for respiratory and cardiac motion compensation in cardiac PET.

Tuomas Koivumäki1, Stephan G Nekolla, Sebastian Fürst, Simone Loher, Marko Vauhkonen, Markus Schwaiger, Mikko A Hakulinen.   

Abstract

Respiratory motion may degrade image quality in cardiac PET imaging. Since cardiac PET studies often involve cardiac gating by ECG, a separate respiratory monitoring system is required increasing the logistic complexity of the examination, in case respiratory gating is also needed. Thus, we investigated the simultaneous acquisition of both respiratory and cardiac gating signals using II limb lead mimicking electrode configuration during cardiac PET scans of 11 patients. In addition to conventional static and ECG-gated images, bioimpedance technique was utilized to generate respiratory- and dual-gated images. The ability of the bioimpedance technique to monitor intrathoracic respiratory motion was assessed estimating cardiac displacement between end-inspiration and -expiration. The relevance of dual gating was evaluated in left ventricular volume and myocardial wall thickness measurements. An average 7.6  ±  3.3 mm respiratory motion was observed in the study population. Dual gating showed a small but significant increase (4 ml, p = 0.042) in left ventricular myocardial volume compared to plain cardiac gating. In addition, a thinner myocardial wall was observed in dual-gated images (9.3  ±  1.3 mm) compared to cardiac-gated images (11.3  ±  1.3 mm, p = 0.003). This study shows the feasibility of bioimpedance measurements for dual gating in a clinical setting. The method enables simultaneous acquisition of respiratory and cardiac gating signals using a single device with standard ECG electrodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25295531     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Attenuation correction in cardiac PET: To raise awareness for a problem which is as old as PET/CT.

Authors:  Stephan G Nekolla; Axel Martinez-Möller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Motion correction options in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Imaging moving heart structures with PET.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Tinsu Pan; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Respiratory motion reduction with a dual gating approach in myocardial perfusion SPECT: Effect on left ventricular functional parameters.

Authors:  Matti J Kortelainen; Tuomas M Koivumäki; Marko J Vauhkonen; Marja K Hedman; Satu T J Kärkkäinen; Juanita Niño Quintero; Mikko A Hakulinen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Enhancing Cardiac PET by Motion Correction Techniques.

Authors:  Mathieu Rubeaux; Mhairi K Doris; Adam Alessio; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Motion Correction and Its Impact on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Measures with PET.

Authors:  Marina Piccinelli; John R Votaw; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Effect of PET-CT misalignment on the quantitative accuracy of cardiac 15O-water PET.

Authors:  Jonny Nordström; Hendrik J Harms; Tanja Kero; Maryam Ebrahimi; Jens Sörensen; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.872

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.