Literature DB >> 25294931

Sexual selection on wing interference patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.

Natsu Katayama1, Jessica K Abbott2, Jostein Kjærandsen3, Yuma Takahashi4, Erik I Svensson5.   

Abstract

Animals with color vision use color information in intra- and interspecific communication, which in turn may drive the evolution of conspicuous colored body traits via natural and sexual selection. A recent study found that the transparent wings of small flies and wasps in lower-reflectance light environments display vivid and stable structural color patterns, called "wing interference patterns" (WIPs). Such WIPs were hypothesized to function in sexual selection among small insects with wing displays, but this has not been experimentally verified. Here, to our knowledge we present the first experimental evidence that WIPs in males of Drosophila melanogaster are targets of mate choice from females, and that two different color traits--saturation and hue--experience directional and stabilizing sexual selection, respectively. Using isogenic lines from the D. melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel, we compare attractiveness of different male WIPs against black and white visual backgrounds. We show that males with more vivid wings are more attractive to females than are males with dull wings. Wings with a large magenta area (i.e., intermediate trait values) were also preferred over those with a large blue or yellow area. These experimental results add a visual element to the Drosophila mating array, integrating sexual selection with elements of genetics and evo-devo, potentially applicable to a wide array of small insects with hyaline wings. Our results further underscore that the mode of sexual selection on such visual signals can differ profoundly between different color components, in this case hue and saturation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  color; mate choice; sexual selection; signaling; wing interference patterns

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25294931      PMCID: PMC4210313          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407595111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  A tropical horde of counterfeit predator eyes.

Authors:  Daniel H Janzen; Winnie Hallwachs; John M Burns
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Y chromosome polymorphism is a strong determinant of male fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A K Chippindale; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Accommodating natural and sexual selection in butterfly wing pattern evolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Oliver; Kendra A Robertson; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Masquerade: camouflage without crypsis.

Authors:  John Skelhorn; Hannah M Rowland; Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The diversification of mate preferences by natural and sexual selection.

Authors:  H D Rundle; S F Chenoweth; M W Blows
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Light conditions affect sexual performance in a lekking tephritid fruit fly.

Authors:  Francisco Díaz-Fleischer; José Arredondo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 7.  Vision in Drosophila: seeing the world through a model's eyes.

Authors:  Angelique Paulk; S Sean Millard; Bruno van Swinderen
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 19.686

8.  The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay; Stephen Richards; Eric A Stone; Antonio Barbadilla; Julien F Ayroles; Dianhui Zhu; Sònia Casillas; Yi Han; Michael M Magwire; Julie M Cridland; Mark F Richardson; Robert R H Anholt; Maite Barrón; Crystal Bess; Kerstin Petra Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; David Castellano; Lesley Chaboub; Laura Duncan; Zeke Harris; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Christina Jayaseelan; Shalini N Jhangiani; Katherine W Jordan; Fremiet Lara; Faye Lawrence; Sandra L Lee; Pablo Librado; Raquel S Linheiro; Richard F Lyman; Aaron J Mackey; Mala Munidasa; Donna Marie Muzny; Lynne Nazareth; Irene Newsham; Lora Perales; Ling-Ling Pu; Carson Qu; Miquel Ràmia; Jeffrey G Reid; Stephanie M Rollmann; Julio Rozas; Nehad Saada; Lavanya Turlapati; Kim C Worley; Yuan-Qing Wu; Akihiko Yamamoto; Yiming Zhu; Casey M Bergman; Kevin R Thornton; David Mittelman; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Substrate-borne vibratory communication during courtship in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Caroline C G Fabre; Berthold Hedwig; Graham Conduit; Peter A Lawrence; Stephen F Goodwin; José Casal
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Song choice is modulated by female movement in Drosophila males.

Authors:  Alexander R Trott; Nathan C Donelson; Leslie C Griffith; Aki Ejima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sexual selection drives the evolution of male wing interference patterns.

Authors:  M F Hawkes; E Duffy; R Joag; A Skeats; J Radwan; N Wedell; M D Sharma; D J Hosken; J Troscianko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalization.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Miguel Gomez-Llano; John T Waller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  From Photons to Behaviors: Neural Implementations of Visual Behaviors in Drosophila.

Authors:  Leesun Ryu; Sung Yong Kim; Anmo J Kim
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 4.  Color vision in insects: insights from Drosophila.

Authors:  Christopher Schnaitmann; Manuel Pagni; Dierk F Reiff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Social selection within aggregative multicellular development drives morphological evolution.

Authors:  Marco La Fortezza; Gregory J Velicer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Can the narrow red bands of dragonflies be used to perceive wing interference patterns?

Authors:  Mikkel Brydegaard; Samuel Jansson; Marcus Schulz; Anna Runemark
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Wing interference patterns are consistent and sexually dimorphic in the four families of crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea).

Authors:  Robert T Conrow; Jon K Gelhaus
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 1.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.