Hyung Wook Kim1, Su-Hyun Kim2, Young Ok Kim3, Dong Chan Jin3, Ho Chul Song3, Euy Jin Choi3, Yong-Lim Kim4, Yon-Su Kim5, Shin-Wook Kang6, Nam-Ho Kim7, Chul Woo Yang3, Yong Kyun Kim8. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Korea. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea MRC for Cell Death Disease Research Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea drkimyk@catholic.ac.kr.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: ♦ BACKGROUND: The impact of timing of dialysis initiation on mortality is controversial in patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD). In this study, we analyzed the impact of timing of dialysis initiation on mortality in the incident PD population. ♦ METHODS: Incident patients with PD were selected from the Clinical Research Center (CRC) registry for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), a prospective cohort study on dialysis in Korea. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the initiation of PD using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Group A was defined as eGFR < 5 mL/min/1.73m(2), group B as eGFR 5 - 10 mL/min/1.73m(2), and group C as eGFR > 10 mL/min/1.73m(2). Cox regression analysis was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of mortality with group B as the reference. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. ♦ RESULTS: A total of 495 incident PD patients were included. The number of patients in group A was 109, group B was 279, and group C was 107. The median follow-up period was 23 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that group A had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with group B (HR 4.13, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55 - 11.03, p = 0.005) after adjustment for age, gender, cause of ESRD, serum albumin level, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. There was no significant difference in mortality between group C and group B (HR 1.50, 95% CI, 0.59 - 3.80, p = 0.398) after adjustment for clinical variables. ♦ CONCLUSION: An eGFR < 5 mL/min/1.73m(2) at the initiation of PD was a significant risk factor for death, while an eGFR >10 mL/min/1.73m(2) at the initiation of PD was not associated with improved survival compared with an eGFR of 5 - 10 mL/min/1.73m(2) at the initiation of PD.
UNLABELLED: ♦ BACKGROUND: The impact of timing of dialysis initiation on mortality is controversial in patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD). In this study, we analyzed the impact of timing of dialysis initiation on mortality in the incident PD population. ♦ METHODS: Incident patients with PD were selected from the Clinical Research Center (CRC) registry for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), a prospective cohort study on dialysis in Korea. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the initiation of PD using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Group A was defined as eGFR < 5 mL/min/1.73m(2), group B as eGFR 5 - 10 mL/min/1.73m(2), and group C as eGFR > 10 mL/min/1.73m(2). Cox regression analysis was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of mortality with group B as the reference. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. ♦ RESULTS: A total of 495 incident PDpatients were included. The number of patients in group A was 109, group B was 279, and group C was 107. The median follow-up period was 23 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that group A had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with group B (HR 4.13, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55 - 11.03, p = 0.005) after adjustment for age, gender, cause of ESRD, serum albumin level, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. There was no significant difference in mortality between group C and group B (HR 1.50, 95% CI, 0.59 - 3.80, p = 0.398) after adjustment for clinical variables. ♦ CONCLUSION: An eGFR < 5 mL/min/1.73m(2) at the initiation of PD was a significant risk factor for death, while an eGFR >10 mL/min/1.73m(2) at the initiation of PD was not associated with improved survival compared with an eGFR of 5 - 10 mL/min/1.73m(2) at the initiation of PD.
Authors: Muh Geot Wong; Carol A Pollock; Bruce A Cooper; Pauline Branley; John F Collins; Jonathan C Craig; Joan Kesselhut; Grant Luxton; Andrew Pilmore; David C Harris; David W Johnson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Waqar H Kazmi; David T Gilbertson; Gregorio T Obrador; Haifeng Guo; Brian J G Pereira; Allan J Collins; Annamaria T Kausz Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Miguel Pérez Fontan; Ana Rodríguez-Carmona; Rafael García-Naveiro; Miguel Rosales; Pedro Villaverde; Francisco Valdés Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Jamie P Traynor; Keith Simpson; Colin C Geddes; Christopher J Deighan; Jonathan G Fox Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 10.121