Literature DB >> 25292111

Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV).

Yang Zhao1, Andre J A Aarnink2, Wei Wang3, Teun Fabri3, Peter W G Groot Koerkamp4, Mart C M de Jong5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The airborne transmission of infectious diseases in livestock production is increasingly receiving research attention. Reliable techniques of air sampling are crucial to underpin the findings of such studies. This study evaluated the physical and biological efficiencies and detection limits of four samplers (Andersen 6-stage impactor, all-glass impinger "AGI-30", OMNI-3000 and MD8 with gelatin filter) for collecting aerosols of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). MATERIALS AND
METHOD: IBDV aerosols mixed with a physical tracer (uranine) were generated in an isolator, and then collected by the bioaerosol samplers. Samplers' physical and biological efficiencies were derived based on the tracer concentration and the virus/tracer ratio, respectively. Detection limits for the samplers were estimated with the obtained efficiency data.
RESULTS: Physical efficiencies of the AGI-30 (96%) and the MD8 (100%) were significantly higher than that of the OMNI-3000 (60%). Biological efficiency of the OMNI-3000 (23%) was significantly lower than 100% (P < 0.01), indicating inactivation of airborne virus during sampling. The AGI-30, the Andersen impactor and the MD8 did not significantly inactivate virus during sampling. The 2-min detection limits of the samplers on airborne IBDV were 4.1 log10 50% egg infective dose (EID50) m (-3) for the Andersen impactor, 3.3 log10 EID50 m (-3) for the AGI-30, 2.5 log10 EID50 m (-3) for the OMNI-3000, and 2.9 log10 EID50 m (-3) for the MD8. The mean half-life of IBDV aerosolized at 20 °C and 70% was 11.9 min.
CONCLUSION: Efficiencies of different samplers vary. Despite its relatively low sampling efficiency, the OMNI-3000 is suitable for use in environments with low viral concentrations because its high flow rate gives a low detection limit. With the 4 samplers investigated, negative air samples cannot guarantee virus-free aerial environments, which means that transmission of infectious agents between farms may still occur even when no virus has been detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25292111     DOI: 10.5604/12321966.1120585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med        ISSN: 1232-1966            Impact factor:   1.447


  9 in total

1.  Sampling and detection of airborne influenza virus towards point-of-care applications.

Authors:  Laila Ladhani; Gaspard Pardon; Hanne Meeuws; Liesbeth van Wesenbeeck; Kristiane Schmidt; Lieven Stuyver; Wouter van der Wijngaart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Deposition of respiratory virus pathogens on frequently touched surfaces at airports.

Authors:  Niina Ikonen; Carita Savolainen-Kopra; Joanne E Enstone; Ilpo Kulmala; Pertti Pasanen; Anniina Salmela; Satu Salo; Jonathan S Nguyen-Van-Tam; Petri Ruutu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Monitoring of Air Microbial Contaminations in Different Bioenergy Facilities Using Cultural and Biomolecular Methods.

Authors:  Elisa Anedda; Giulia Carletto; Giorgio Gilli; Deborah Traversi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Collection, particle sizing and detection of airborne viruses.

Authors:  M Pan; J A Lednicky; C-Y Wu
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  From nasal to basal: single-cell sequencing of the bursa of Fabricius highlights the IBDV infection mechanism in chickens.

Authors:  Abid Ullah Shah; Yuchen Li; Wei Ouyang; Zhisheng Wang; Jinjiao Zuo; Song Shi; Qinghua Yu; Jian Lin; Qian Yang
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 7.133

Review 6.  Recent advancements in the measurement of pathogenic airborne viruses.

Authors:  Jyoti Bhardwaj; Seongkyeol Hong; Junbeom Jang; Chang-Ho Han; Jaegil Lee; Jaesung Jang
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 7.  Viral outbreaks detection and surveillance using wastewater-based epidemiology, viral air sampling, and machine learning techniques: A comprehensive review and outlook.

Authors:  Omar M Abdeldayem; Areeg M Dabbish; Mahmoud M Habashy; Mohamed K Mostafa; Mohamed Elhefnawy; Lobna Amin; Eslam G Al-Sakkari; Ahmed Ragab; Eldon R Rene
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Ability of Essential Oil Vapours to Reduce Numbers of Culturable Aerosolised Coronavirus, Bacteria and Fungi.

Authors:  Parthasarathi Kalaiselvan; Muhammad Yasir; Rajesh Kuppusamy; Mark Willcox; Ajay Kumar Vijay
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15

9.  Comparison of three air samplers for the collection of four nebulized respiratory viruses - Collection of respiratory viruses from air.

Authors:  Jasmin S Kutter; Dennis de Meulder; Theo M Bestebroer; Ard Mulders; Ron A M Fouchier; Sander Herfst
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.770

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.