Terhi Kurko1, Kari Linden1,2, Maija Kolstela3, Kirsi Pietilä4, Marja Airaksinen1. 1. Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 2. Global Innovative Pharma, Pfizer Oy, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Organisation for Respiratory Health in Finland, Helsinki, Finland. 4. Kontula Pharmacy, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Internet discussion forums provide new, albeit less used data sources for exploring personal experiences of illness and treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To gain an understanding of how discussion forum participants value nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in smoking cessation (SC). SETTING: Finnish national Internet-based discussion forum, STUMPPI, supporting SC and consisting of ten free discussion areas, each with a different focus. The analysis was based on STUMPPI forum participants' postings (n = 24 481) in five discussion areas during January 2007-January 2012. DESIGN: Inductive content analysis of the postings concerning NRT use or comparing NRT to other SC methods. RESULTS: Three major themes related to NRT in SC emerged from the discussions. These were as follows: (I) distrust and negative attitude towards NRT; (II) neutral acceptance of NRT as a useful SC method; and (III) trust on the crucial role of NRT and other SC medicines. The negative attitude was related to following perceptions: NRT use maintains tobacco dependence, fear of NRT dependence or experience of not gaining help from NRT use. NRT was perceived to be useful particularly in the initiation of SC attempts and in dealing with physiological dependence. The most highlighted factors of successful quitting were quitters' own psychological empowerment and peer support from the discussion community. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of STUMPPI forum participants had low or balanced expectations towards the role of NRT in SC. More research from the smokers' and quitters' perspective is needed to assess the real value of NRT compared to other methods in SC.
BACKGROUND: Internet discussion forums provide new, albeit less used data sources for exploring personal experiences of illness and treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To gain an understanding of how discussion forum participants value nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in smoking cessation (SC). SETTING: Finnish national Internet-based discussion forum, STUMPPI, supporting SC and consisting of ten free discussion areas, each with a different focus. The analysis was based on STUMPPI forum participants' postings (n = 24 481) in five discussion areas during January 2007-January 2012. DESIGN: Inductive content analysis of the postings concerning NRT use or comparing NRT to other SC methods. RESULTS: Three major themes related to NRT in SC emerged from the discussions. These were as follows: (I) distrust and negative attitude towards NRT; (II) neutral acceptance of NRT as a useful SC method; and (III) trust on the crucial role of NRT and other SC medicines. The negative attitude was related to following perceptions: NRT use maintains tobacco dependence, fear of NRT dependence or experience of not gaining help from NRT use. NRT was perceived to be useful particularly in the initiation of SC attempts and in dealing with physiological dependence. The most highlighted factors of successful quitting were quitters' own psychological empowerment and peer support from the discussion community. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of STUMPPI forum participants had low or balanced expectations towards the role of NRT in SC. More research from the smokers' and quitters' perspective is needed to assess the real value of NRT compared to other methods in SC.
Authors: Stuart G Ferguson; Joseph G Gitchell; Saul Shiffman; Mark A Sembower; Jeffrey M Rohay; Jane Allen Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2011-02-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Pedro Marques-Vidal; João Melich-Cerveira; Fred Paccaud; Gérard Waeber; Peter Vollenweider; Jacques Cornuz Journal: Prev Med Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Hanna E Tervonen; Juha H O Turunen; Christine L Baker; Juha Laine; Kari Linden Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ida Kristiane Roelsgaard; Thordis Thomsen; Mikkel Østergaard; Anne Grete Semb; Lena Andersen; Bente Appel Esbensen Journal: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Date: 2020-12