Literature DB >> 25291750

Impact of personality characteristics on patient satisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: results from the "happy patient study".

Ulrich Mester, Thomas Vaterrodt, Frank Goes, Werner Huetz, Irmingard Neuhann, Stefanie Schmickler, Peter Szurman, Katrin Gekeler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective multicenter study assessed personality characteristics that may influence patient satisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs).
METHODS: One hundred eighty-three patients who underwent bilateral implantation of different MIOLs were enrolled. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity for distance and near (ie, UDVA, UNVA, CDVA, and CNVA) were assessed preoperatively and 3 and 6 months after implantation. Before surgery, personality characteristics were evaluated using a questionnaire based on the NEO Personality Inventory Test and the Compulsiveness Inventory Test. At the 3- and 6-month postoperative visits, patients answered a questionnaire concerning overall satisfaction, need for spectacles at different distances, visual function at different distances and lighting conditions, photic phenomena, and ease of performing daily activities.
RESULTS: Three months after surgery (n = 163), mean CDVA was 0.03 ± 0.09 logMAR, UDVA was 0.05 ± 0.09 logMAR, and UNVA was 0.04 ± 0.11 logMAR. At the 6-month visit (n = 131), mean CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.07 logMAR, UDVA was 0.06 ± 0.09 logMAR, and UNVA was 0.05 ± 0.01 logMAR. Most patients (82.2%) would opt for an MIOL again, 3.7% would not, and 14.1% were uncertain. Overall satisfaction with the procedure was correlated to low astigmatism, good visual function, low spectacle dependence, and less halos or glare. The personality characteristics of compulsive checking, orderliness, competence, and dutifulness were statistically significantly correlated to subjective disturbance by glare and halos.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative patient satisfaction after MIOL implantation is correlated to visual performance, spectacle independence, and less photic phenomena. Personality characteristics have an impact on subjective disturbance by photic phenomena and thus are important for patient satisfaction. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25291750     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140903-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  Association of Clinician Denial of Patient Requests With Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Joshua J Fenton; Richard L Kravitz; Daniel J Tancredi; Elizabeth Magnan; Klea D Bertakis; Peter Franks
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Scanning Light Scattering Profiler (SLPS) Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Bennett N Walker; Robert H James; Don Calogero; Ilko K Ilev
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  From Presbyopia to Cataracts: A Critical Review on Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome.

Authors:  Joaquín Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Ana Tauste; David P Piñero
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Defocus Curve and Patient Satisfaction with a New Extended Depth of Focus Toric Intraocular Lens Targeted for Binocular Emmetropia or Slight Myopia in the Non-Dominant Eye.

Authors:  Helga P Sandoval; Stephen Lane; Stephen G Slade; Eric D Donnenfeld; Richard Potvin; Kerry D Solomon
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-26

Review 5.  AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.

Authors:  Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir; Arindam Dey; Shovan Bhattacharrya; Amit Bahulayan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

6.  Patient Expectation, Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes with a New Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Matthew Ison; Jane Scott; John Apel; Andrew Apel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-13

7.  Visual Performance Following Bilateral Implantation of Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Bifocal Intraocular Lens (LS-313 MF30) or Apodized Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens (ReSTOR SN6AD1).

Authors:  Honglei Li; Dongle Liu; Han Gao; Jiajun Sun; Huiran Bai; Xiaoming Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zequan Xu; Danmin Cao; Xu Chen; Song Wu; Xin Wang; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.