Literature DB >> 2529021

Coronary revascularization after thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction: what caseloads could Canadian centres face?

J S Floras1, C D Naylor, P W Armstrong.   

Abstract

A simple model was developed to project the potential effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy on the caseloads of revascularization early after acute myocardial infarction. Published data were used to estimate the proportion of infarct patients eligible for thrombolytic treatment and their subsequent rates of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS) within 2 weeks and up to 6 to 12 weeks after treatment. Toronto regional caseload data were obtained from registries and hospital discharge records. Our primary projections, based only on coronary angiography for evidence of spontaneous or exercise-induced ischemia, suggest a 165% increase in the post-thrombolysis use of PTCA within 2 weeks of infarction and even greater increases 6 to 12 weeks after infarction. Adding in selective use of salvage PTCA for some patients with persisting pain despite thrombolysis increases the overall PTCA caseload within 2 weeks by 242%. Data on the current caseload of post-thrombolysis CABS are unavailable. However, our projected caseload for the 30% of infarct patients treated with thrombolytic drugs equals or exceeds the current number of CABS procedures performed on all infarct patients within a month of the event. All these projections are conservative, in that they consider neither procedures 3 to 12 months after infarction nor restenosis after PTCA. This analysis illustrates that current approaches to revascularization after thrombolytic therapy could have a substantial effect on PTCA and CABS caseloads. Further studies with improved caseload data are needed to validate these preliminary projections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2529021      PMCID: PMC1451321     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  24 in total

1.  Late restenosis after emergent coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: comparison with elective coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  C A Simonton; D B Mark; T Hinohara; D S Rendall; H R Phillips; R H Peter; V S Behar; Y Kong; W G O'Callaghan; C O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Reperfusion therapy of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W W O'Neill; E J Topol; B Pitt
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.194

3.  Eligibility for thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J D Jagger; R G Murray; M K Davies; W A Littler; E J Flint
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-01-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Failure of simple clinical measurements to predict perfusion status after intravenous thrombolysis.

Authors:  R M Califf; W O'Neil; R S Stack; L Aronson; D B Mark; S Mantell; B S George; R J Candela; D J Kereiakes; C Abbottsmith
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Effect of intravenous streptokinase on left ventricular function and early survival after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H D White; R M Norris; M A Brown; M Takayama; A Maslowski; N M Bass; J A Ormiston; T Whitlock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The Western Washington Intravenous Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial Infarction Randomized Trial.

Authors:  J W Kennedy; G V Martin; K B Davis; C Maynard; M Stadius; F H Sheehan; J L Ritchie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with single-vessel disease.

Authors:  P P Leimgruber; G S Roubin; J Hollman; G A Cotsonis; B Meier; J S Douglas; S B King; A R Gruentzig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E J Topol; R M Califf; B S George; D J Kereiakes; C W Abbottsmith; R J Candela; K L Lee; B Pitt; R S Stack; W W O'Neill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-09-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Randomised trial of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. Report from the European Cooperative Study Group for Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator.

Authors:  M Verstraete; R Bernard; M Bory; R W Brower; D Collen; D P de Bono; R Erbel; W Huhmann; R J Lennane; J Lubsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: no additional benefit from immediate percutaneous coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  M L Simoons; A E Arnold; A Betriu; D P de Bono; J Col; F C Dougherty; R von Essen; H Lambertz; J Lubsen; B Meier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Ottawa Heart Institute: it's good, but can we afford it?

Authors:  T O Cheng
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Trends in coronary artery bypass grafting in Ontario from 1981 to 1989.

Authors:  A M Ugnat; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.