Literature DB >> 2858711

Randomised trial of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. Report from the European Cooperative Study Group for Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator.

M Verstraete, R Bernard, M Bory, R W Brower, D Collen, D P de Bono, R Erbel, W Huhmann, R J Lennane, J Lubsen.   

Abstract

In a single-blind randomised trial in patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 h duration, the frequency of coronary patency was found to be higher after intravenous administration of recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) than after intravenous streptokinase. 64 patients were allocated to 0.75 mg rt-PA/kg over 90 min, and the infarct-related coronary artery was patent in 70% of 61 assessable coronary angiograms taken 75-90 min after the start of infusion; 65 patients were allocated to 1 500 000 IU streptokinase over 60 min, and the infarct-related vessel was patent in 55% of 62 assessable angiograms. The 95% confidence interval of the differences ranges from +/- 30 to -2% (p = 0.054). Bleeding episodes and other complications were less common in the rt-PA patients than in the streptokinase group. Hospital mortality was identical in the 2 treatment groups. At the end of the rt-PA infusion the circulating fibrinogen level was 61 +/- 35% of the starting value, as measured by a coagulation-rate assay, and 69 +/- 25% as measured by sodium sulphite precipitation. After streptokinase infusion, corresponding fibrinogen levels were 12 +/- 18% and 20 +/- 11%. In the rt-PA group only 4.5% of the fibrinogen was measured as incoagulable fibrinogen degradation products, compared with 30% in the streptokinase group. Activation of the systemic fibrinolytic system was far less pronounced with rt-PA than with streptokinase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2858711     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92208-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  80 in total

1.  The Open Artery Hypothesis: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  M Goel; J T Dodge; M Rizzo; C McLean; K A Ryan; W L Daley; C P Cannon; C M Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  What's the point of ST elevation?

Authors:  S D Carley; R Gamon; P A Driscoll; G Brown; P Wallman
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Compartment syndrome of the arm: a complication of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring during thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Winslow Alford; Mark A Palumbo; Michael J Barnum
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Answers to complex questions cannot be derived from "simple" trials.

Authors:  E J Topol; R M Califf
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-10

5.  Thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Lessons to be learned.

Authors:  S Sherry
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

6.  Current status of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B Stein; R Roberts
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

7.  Coronary angioplasty in emergency treatment of myocardial infarction in a community-hospital setting.

Authors:  R P Sotolongo; M L Smith; W S Margolis
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

8.  Is thrombolysis alone the best therapy for acute myocardial infarction? Current status and emerging strategies.

Authors:  P Golino; J T Willerson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

Review 9.  Use of plasminogen activators in venous thrombosis.

Authors:  J Hirsh; A G Turpie
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  [Arrhythmia as an indicator for reperfusion following acute myocardial infarct?].

Authors:  K Langes; W Bleifeld; D G Mathey; K H Kuck
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1989-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.