| Literature DB >> 25288931 |
C L Abayasekara1, N K B Adikaram1, U W N P Wanigasekara1, B M R Bandara2.
Abstract
Anthracnose development by Colletotrichum musae was observed to be significantly less in the fruits of the banana cultivar 'Embul' (Mysore, AAB) infected with Phyllosticta musarum than in fruits without such infections. Anthracnose disease originates from quiescent C. musae infections in the immature fruit. P. musarum incites minute, scattered spots, referred to as freckles, in the superficial tissues of immature banana peel which do not expand during maturation or ripening. P. musarum does not appear to have a direct suppressive effect on C. musae as conidia of C. musae germinate on both freckled and non-freckled fruit forming quiescent infections. Our investigations have shown that P. musarum infection induced several defence responses in fruit including the accumulation of five phytoalexins, upregulation of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity and cell wall lignification. (1)H and (13)C NMR spectral data of one purified phytoalexin compared closely with 4'-hydroxyanigorufone. Some of the P. musarum-induced defences that retained during ripening, restrict C. musae development at the ripe stage. This paper examines the potential of P. musarum-induced defences, in the control of anthracnose, the most destructive postharvest disease in banana.Entities:
Keywords: Colletotrichum musae; Phyllosticta musarum; anthracnose; freckle disease in banana; induced defences
Year: 2013 PMID: 25288931 PMCID: PMC4174796 DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.06.2012.0081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Pathol J ISSN: 1598-2254 Impact factor: 1.795
Fig. 1Transverse section of freckle-infected peel showing pycnidia of Phyllosticta musarum (4 × 10). A: pycnidia, B: epidermis.
Anthracnose development during ripening in healthy and P. musarum-infected bananas cv. ‘Embul’ following inoculation or natural infection with C. musae. Each data point represents the mean lesion area of 48 fruits per day (experiment was repeated 3 times)
| Average lesion area per fruit (cm2) at FPA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 0 | 40 | 200 | |
| 7 days after inoculation (AI) days after harvest (NI) | 4.94a ± 1.06 | 0.79b ± 0.04 | 0.03b ± 0.01 |
| 9 | 0.93a ± 0.06 | 0.44b ± 0.03 | 0.21b ± 0.04 |
| 10 | 2.73a ± 0.29 | 0.64b ± 0.02 | 0.51b ± 0.06 |
| 11 | 4.51a ± 0.56 | 2.36b ± 0.15 | 0.84b ± 0.09 |
FPA – Freckles per cm2 area. NI = natural infections, AI = artificial inoculation
Means (± standard deviation) in a row followed by the same letters are not significantly different according to DMRT (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2Anthracnose development in artificially inoculated fruits with C. musae five days after inoculation in (A) healthy banana, (B) P. musarum infected banana (40 FPA).
Percentage (I) and surface area (S) with C. musae quiescent infections in healthy and P. musarum-infected fruit peel segments, after incubation for 5 days at room temperature on Cook’s No. 2 (25% strength) medium. Each data point represents the mean values of I or S from 20 peel segments (experiment was repeated 3 times)
| 0 FPA | 200 FPA | |
|---|---|---|
| % quiescent | 4.33a ± 0.51 | 13.66b ± 0.99 |
| quiescent | 46.89a ± 1.23 | 159.35b ± 5.27 |
FPA = freckles per cm2 area
S = I.W2/3, I = % infected discs in each zone divided by the number of regions. W = fruit weight (Prusky et al., 1981).
Means (± standard deviation) in a row followed by the same letters are not significantly different according to DMRT (p < 0.05).
Fig. 3TLC bioassay of ethyl acetate extracts of peel of (A) healthy and (B) P. musarum-infected fruit peel showing zones of inhibition using C. cladosporioides. (C) P. musarum-infected and (D) healthy fruit peel showing zones of inhibition using C. musae.
Fig. 4TLC bioassay (using C. cladosporioides) of ethyl acetate extracts of P. musarum infected fruit peel having different freckle intensities.
Fig. 5Structure of 4′-hydroxyanigorufone (C7).
Chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activity of mature, unripe banana fruit peel with varying intensities of P. musarum infection. Each data point represents the mean values of three replicate bunches
| Freckle infection (FPA) | Chitinase activity (Units/g FW) | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.47a ± 0.47 | 0.140a ± 0.01 |
| 40 | 2.07a ± 1.01 | 0.244b ± 0.01 |
| 200 | 33.93b ± 9.72 | 0.450c ± 0.03 |
FPA = freckles per cm2 area
Absorbance at 610 nm
Means (± standard deviation) in a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different according to DMRT (p < 0.05).
Fig. 6(A) Chitinase and (B) β-1,3-glucanase activity in the peel of P. musarum infected or healthy fruits challenge inoculated with or without C. musae during ripening. Each data point represents the mean value of enzymatic activity of peel tissue of 3 fruits per day (experiment was repeated 3 times). Vertical bars represent the standard error. ↓-Commencement of anthracnose development.
Concentration of cinnamic acid produced by PAL activity and cell wall bound phenolics in P. musarum-infected and healthy banana peel tissue. Each data point represents the mean values of three replicate bunches
| Concentration of cinnamic acid | Concentration of cell wall bound phenolic acid (quantified in ferulic acid equivalents) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| mmol/gFw/h | μg/gFw | |
| 25.3a ± 1.02 | NA | |
| Young infected peel | 51.5b ± 2.04 | NA |
| Mature healthy peel | 29.5a ± 1.08 | 0.60x ± 0.04 |
| Mature infected peel | 70.5c ± 2.24 | 0.81y ± 0.03 |
NA: Not assessed.
Means (± standard deviation) in a column followed by the same letters are not significantly different according to DMRT (concentration of cinnamic acid) and t-test (concentration of cell wall bound phenolics) (p < 0.05).