BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of radiolabeled white blood cells (WBCs) scintigraphy in mediastinitis is well established, but data in the specific context of relapse are lacking. The present study aimed at evaluation of the diagnostic value of WBCs scintigraphy in suspicion of mediastinitis relapse after prior surgical revision. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multiple planar incidences of the chest were acquired 4 and 20 hours after injection of labeled WBC in 43 patients. In case of non-conclusive scintigraphy, a second scan was performed 2-3 weeks after the first one. The diagnosis of infection was based on positive bacteriological results; otherwise patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Out of 39 analyzable patients, 17 (44%) were diagnosed with mediastinitis relapse. After the first scan, 32 of 39 were correctly classified, 2 were false positive, and 5 were not conclusive. After completion of an additional scan in the latter 5 patients, 36 of 39 were correctly classified and 3 were false positive (100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 85% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value). CONCLUSIONS: In the specific context of suspicion of mediastinitis relapse, the optimal diagnostic value was achieved by repeating the scan when the first one was not conclusive. In this context, a negative WBC scintigraphy was able to rule out infection, with potential major impact on therapeutic management in patients with poor clinical status.
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of radiolabeled white blood cells (WBCs) scintigraphy in mediastinitis is well established, but data in the specific context of relapse are lacking. The present study aimed at evaluation of the diagnostic value of WBCs scintigraphy in suspicion of mediastinitis relapse after prior surgical revision. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multiple planar incidences of the chest were acquired 4 and 20 hours after injection of labeled WBC in 43 patients. In case of non-conclusive scintigraphy, a second scan was performed 2-3 weeks after the first one. The diagnosis of infection was based on positive bacteriological results; otherwise patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Out of 39 analyzable patients, 17 (44%) were diagnosed with mediastinitis relapse. After the first scan, 32 of 39 were correctly classified, 2 were false positive, and 5 were not conclusive. After completion of an additional scan in the latter 5 patients, 36 of 39 were correctly classified and 3 were false positive (100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 85% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value). CONCLUSIONS: In the specific context of suspicion of mediastinitis relapse, the optimal diagnostic value was achieved by repeating the scan when the first one was not conclusive. In this context, a negative WBC scintigraphy was able to rule out infection, with potential major impact on therapeutic management in patients with poor clinical status.
Authors: M Liberatore; V Fiore; A D'Agostini; D Prosperi; A P Iurilli; C Santini; P Baiocchi; M Galiè; G D Di Nucci; R Sinatra Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 2000-06
Authors: Emilio Bouza; Arístides de Alarcón; María Carmen Fariñas; Juan Gálvez; Miguel Ángel Goenaga; Francisco Gutiérrez-Díez; Javier Hortal; José Lasso; Carlos A Mestres; José M Miró; Enrique Navas; Mercedes Nieto; Antonio Parra; Enrique Pérez de la Sota; Hugo Rodríguez-Abella; Marta Rodríguez-Créixems; Jorge Rodríguez-Roda; Gemma Sánchez Espín; Dolores Sousa; Carlos Velasco García de Sierra; Patricia Muñoz; Martha Kestler Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 4.241