Literature DB >> 25287366

Comparison of conventional versus crossed monovision in pseudophakia.

Jaeyoung Kim1, Hyun Jin Shin1, Hyung Chan Kim1, Ki Cheul Shin1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the visual performances and patient satisfactions of conventional monovision, which corrects the dominant eye for distance vision, and crossed monovision, which corrects the non-dominant eye for distance vision in patients with pseudophakia.
METHODS: This prospective randomised study was conducted in 59 patients who underwent implantation of different targets of monofocal intraocular lens for each eye at Konkuk University Medical Center between November 2009 and August 2012. The following were examined before bilateral cataract surgery and 2 months after the surgery: refractive error, binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and stereopsis. Questionnaires to evaluate postoperative spectacle dependence and patient satisfaction were completed by all patients.
RESULTS: The conventional monovision group and the crossed monovision group were composed of 28 and 31 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in postoperative UCDVA, UCNVA, BCVA and stereopsis between the two groups. In addition, patient satisfaction with near and distant vision and spectacle dependence were not significantly different in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of the crossed monovision were not significantly different from the results of conventional monovision. Therefore, crossed monovision can also be a valuable option for correcting postoperative presbyopia in patients considering bilateral cataract surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0001065. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Trial; Optics and Refraction; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25287366     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of pseudophakic monovision for presbyopia correction.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Aspa Toli; Aslin Perente; Panagiota Ntonti; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Combination of Toric and multifocal intraocular lens implantation in bilateral cataract patients with unilateral astigmatism.

Authors:  Jing-Li Liang; Fang Tian; Hong Zhang; He Teng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Implantation of Monofocal IOL in One Eye and ERV IOL in the Contralateral Eye with Mini-Monovision.

Authors:  Sheetal Brar; Sri Ganesh; Raghavender Reddy Arra; Smith Snehal Sute
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-04

4.  Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarek Abdelrazek Hafez; Hany Ahmed Helaly
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-31

Review 5.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

6.  Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Yan Xun; Wenjuan Wan; Lu Jiang; Ke Hu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.209

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.