Literature DB >> 25287114

Frequency of and predictors for withholding patient safety concerns among oncology staff: a survey study.

D L B Schwappach1, K Gehring.   

Abstract

Speaking up about patient safety is vital to avoid errors reaching the patient and to improve a culture of safety. This study investigated the prevalence of non-speaking up despite concerns for safety and aimed to identify predictors for withholding voice among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in oncology. A self-administered questionnaire assessed safety concerns, speaking up beliefs and behaviours among nurses and doctors from nine oncology departments. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify predictors for withholding safety concerns. A total of 1013 HCPs returned the completed survey (response rate 65%). Safety concerns were common among responders. Fifty-four per cent reported to recognise their colleagues making potentially harmful errors at least sometimes. A majority of responders reported at least some episodes of withholding concerns about patient safety. Thirty-seven per cent said they remained silent at least once when they had information that might have helped prevent an incident. Respondents believed that a high level of interpersonal, communication and coping skills are necessary to speak up about patient safety issues at their workplace. Higher levels of perceived advocacy for patient safety and psychological safety significantly decreased the frequency of withholding voice. Remaining silent about safety concerns is a common phenomenon in oncology. Improved strategies are needed to support staff in effective communication and make cancer care safer.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; medical errors; oncology; patient safety; safety culture; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25287114     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  6 in total

1.  Speak up-related climate and its association with healthcare workers' speaking up and withholding voice behaviours: a cross-sectional survey in Switzerland.

Authors:  David Schwappach; Aline Richard
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Exploring the utility of internal whistleblowing in healthcare via agent-based models.

Authors:  Paul Rauwolf; Aled Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Medication safety incidents in paediatric oncology after electronic medication management system implementation.

Authors:  Valentina Lichtner; Melissa Baysari; Peter Gates; Luciano Dalla-Pozza; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.520

4.  "A debriefer must be neutral" and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing.

Authors:  Julia Carolin Seelandt; Katie Walker; Michaela Kolbe
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-04

5.  A concept analysis of psychological safety: Further understanding for application to health care.

Authors:  Ayano Ito; Kana Sato; Yoshie Yumoto; Miki Sasaki; Yasuko Ogata
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-10-15

6.  Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers.

Authors:  Sigall K Bell; Stephanie D Roche; Ariel Mueller; Erica Dente; Kristin O'Reilly; Barbara Sarnoff Lee; Kenneth Sands; Daniel Talmor; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 7.035

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.