Literature DB >> 25286913

Wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring guides management to reduce decompensation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Philip B Adamson1, William T Abraham2, Robert C Bourge2, Maria Rosa Costanzo2, Ayesha Hasan2, Chethan Yadav2, John Henderson2, Pam Cowart2, Lynne Warner Stevenson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No treatment strategies have been demonstrated to be beneficial for the population for patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND
RESULTS: The CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in NYHA Class III Heart Failure Patients (CHAMPION) trial was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial testing the hypothesis that hemodynamically guided HF management decreases decompensation leading to hospitalization. Of the 550 patients enrolled in the study, 119 had left ventricular EF ≥40% (average, 50.6%), 430 patients had low left ventricular EF (<40%; average, 23.3%), and 1 patient had no documented left ventricular EF. A microelectromechanical system pressure sensor was permanently implanted in all participants during right heart catheterization. After implant, subjects were randomly assigned in single-blind fashion to a treatment group in whom daily uploaded pressures were used in a treatment strategy for HF management or to a control group in whom standard HF management included weight-monitoring, and pressures were uploaded but not available for investigator use. The primary efficacy end point of HF hospitalization rate >6 months for preserved EF patients was 46% lower in the treatment group compared with control (incidence rate ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.70; P<0.0001). After an average of 17.6 months of blinded follow-up, the hospitalization rate was 50% lower (incidence rate ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.70; P<0.0001). In response to pulmonary artery pressure information, more changes in diuretic and vasodilator therapies were made in the treatment group.
CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamically guided management of patients with HF with preserved EF reduced decompensation leading to hospitalization compared with standard HF management strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00531661.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; hemodynamic monitoring; hospitalization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25286913     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.001229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  101 in total

Review 1.  The future of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ahmet Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Novel paradigms in the therapeutic management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Fayez El Shear
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2019-10-15

3.  Utility of the Cardiovascular Physical Examination and Impact of Spironolactone in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Senthil Selvaraj; Brian Claggett; Sanjiv J Shah; Inder S Anand; Jean L Rouleau; Akshay S Desai; Eldrin F Lewis; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Stephen Y Wang; Bertram Pitt; Nancy K Sweitzer; Marc A Pfeffer; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 8.790

4.  Adverse Renal Response to Decongestion in the Obese Phenotype of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Yogesh N V Reddy; Masaru Obokata; Jeffrey M Testani; G Michael Felker; W H Wilson Tang; Omar F Abou-Ezzeddine; Jie-Lena Sun; Hrishikesh Chakrabothy; Steven McNulty; Sanjiv J Shah; Gregory D Lewis; Lynne W Stevenson; Margaret M Redfield; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 5.  Phenotype-Specific Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multiorgan Roadmap.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Dalane W Kitzman; Barry A Borlaug; Loek van Heerebeek; Michael R Zile; David A Kass; Walter J Paulus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Remote Monitoring to Reduce Heart Failure Readmissions.

Authors:  Sitaramesh Emani
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-02

Review 7.  Telemonitoring of left-ventricular assist device patients-current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Nils Reiss; Thomas Schmidt; Michael Boeckelmann; Sebastian Schulte-Eistrup; Jan-Dirk Hoffmann; Christina Feldmann; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Perioperative Review.

Authors:  Sasha K Shillcutt; M Megan Chacon; Tara R Brakke; Ellen K Roberts; Thomas E Schulte; Nicholas Markin
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 9.  Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Marrick L Kukin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 10.  Implantable devices to monitor patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Nikolaos Karamichalakis; John Parissis; George Bakosis; Vasiliki Bistola; Ignatios Ikonomidis; Antonios Sideris; Gerasimos Filippatos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.