Literature DB >> 25286867

Context, Contrast, and Tone of Voice in Auditory Sarcasm Perception.

Daniel Voyer1, Sophie-Hélène Thibodeau2, Breanna J Delong2.   

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to investigate the interplay between context and tone of voice in the perception of sarcasm. These experiments emphasized the role of contrast effects in sarcasm perception exclusively by means of auditory stimuli whereas most past research has relied on written material. In all experiments, a positive or negative computer-generated context spoken in a flat emotional tone was followed by a literally positive statement spoken in a sincere or sarcastic tone of voice. Participants indicated for each statement whether the intonation was sincere or sarcastic. In Experiment 1, a congruent context/tone of voice pairing (negative/sarcastic, positive/sincere) produced fast response times and proportions of sarcastic responses in the direction predicted by the tone of voice. Incongruent pairings produced mid-range proportions and slower response times. Experiment 2 introduced ambiguous contexts to determine whether a lower context/statements contrast would affect the proportion of sarcastic responses and response time. Results showed the expected findings for proportions (values between those obtained for congruent and incongruent pairings in the direction predicted by the tone of voice). However, response time failed to produce the predicted pattern, suggesting potential issues with the choice of stimuli. Experiments 3 and 4 extended the results of Experiments 1 and 2, respectively, to auditory stimuli based on written vignettes used in neuropsychological assessment. Results were exactly as predicted by contrast effects in both experiments. Taken together, the findings suggest that both context and tone influence how sarcasm is perceived while supporting the importance of contrast effects in sarcasm perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory perception; Communicative intent; Contrast effects; Sarcasm

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25286867     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-014-9323-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  11 in total

Review 1.  Communicative intentions and language: evidence from right-hemisphere damage and autism.

Authors:  M A Sabbagh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Is there an ironic tone of voice?

Authors:  Gregory A Bryant; Jean E Fox Tree
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Patricia Rockwell
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-09

4.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony.

Authors:  S Kumon-Nakamura; S Glucksberg; M Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1995-03

6.  Social cognition after head injury: sarcasm and theory of mind.

Authors:  Shelley Channon; Asa Pellijeff; Andrea Rule
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Understanding intentions in social interaction: the role of the anterior paracingulate cortex.

Authors:  Henrik Walter; Mauro Adenzato; Angela Ciaramidaro; Ivan Enrici; Lorenzo Pia; Bruno G Bara
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; M Studdert-Kennedy; R S McGowan
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-03

9.  An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults.

Authors:  F G Happé
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1994-04

10.  On the perception of sarcasm in dichotic listening.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer; Andrea Bowes; Cheryl Techentin
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  Using Sarcasm to Compliment: Context, Intonation, and the Perception of Statements with a Negative Literal Meaning.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer; Janie P Vu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-06

2.  Laughter as a paradigm of socio-emotional signal processing in dementia.

Authors:  Harri Sivasathiaseelan; Charles R Marshall; Elia Benhamou; Janneke E P van Leeuwen; Rebecca L Bond; Lucy L Russell; Caroline Greaves; Katrina M Moore; Chris J D Hardy; Chris Frost; Jonathan D Rohrer; Sophie K Scott; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.027

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.