Literature DB >> 25285453

Transferring cognitive tasks between brain imaging modalities: implications for task design and results interpretation in FMRI studies.

Tracy Warbrick1, Martina Reske2, N Jon Shah3.   

Abstract

As cognitive neuroscience methods develop, established experimental tasks are used with emerging brain imaging modalities. Here transferring a paradigm (the visual oddball task) with a long history of behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) experiments to a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment is considered. The aims of this paper are to briefly describe fMRI and when its use is appropriate in cognitive neuroscience; illustrate how task design can influence the results of an fMRI experiment, particularly when that task is borrowed from another imaging modality; explain the practical aspects of performing an fMRI experiment. It is demonstrated that manipulating the task demands in the visual oddball task results in different patterns of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activation. The nature of the fMRI BOLD measure means that many brain regions are found to be active in a particular task. Determining the functions of these areas of activation is very much dependent on task design and analysis. The complex nature of many fMRI tasks means that the details of the task and its requirements need careful consideration when interpreting data. The data show that this is particularly important in those tasks relying on a motor response as well as cognitive elements and that covert and overt responses should be considered where possible. Furthermore, the data show that transferring an EEG paradigm to an fMRI experiment needs careful consideration and it cannot be assumed that the same paradigm will work equally well across imaging modalities. It is therefore recommended that the design of an fMRI study is pilot tested behaviorally to establish the effects of interest and then pilot tested in the fMRI environment to ensure appropriate design, implementation and analysis for the effects of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25285453      PMCID: PMC4828109          DOI: 10.3791/51793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  9 in total

1.  Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing.

Authors:  F M Miezin; L Maccotta; J M Ollinger; S E Petersen; R L Buckner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Prefrontal activation evoked by infrequent target and novel stimuli in a visual target detection task: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  E Kirino; A Belger; P Goldman-Rakic; G McCarthy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The P300 event-related potential and smoking--a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  A Mobascher; J Brinkmeyer; T Warbrick; C Wels; M Wagner; G Gründer; K N Spreckelmeyer; T Wienker; A Diaz Lacava; N Dahmen; M Böttcher; N Thuerauf; M Clepce; F Kiefer; W De Millas; J Gallinat; G Winterer
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich; José R Criado
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Attention to detail: why considering task demands is essential for single-trial analysis of BOLD correlates of the visual P1 and N1.

Authors:  Tracy Warbrick; Jorge Arrubla; Franks Boers; Irene Neuner; N Jon Shah
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Do EEG paradigms work in fMRI? Varying task demands in the visual oddball paradigm: Implications for task design and results interpretation.

Authors:  Tracy Warbrick; Martina Reske; N Jon Shah
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man.

Authors:  N K Squires; K C Squires; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-04

8.  Age-related frontoparietal changes during the control of bottom-up and top-down attention: an ERP study.

Authors:  Ling Li; Caterina Gratton; Monica Fabiani; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 9.  Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: the viability of selected candidate measures.

Authors:  Bruce I Turetsky; Monica E Calkins; Gregory A Light; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; Neal R Swerdlow
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 9.306

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Functional MRI in major depressive disorder: A review of findings, limitations, and future prospects.

Authors:  Jesper Pilmeyer; Willem Huijbers; Rolf Lamerichs; Jacobus F A Jansen; Marcel Breeuwer; Svitlana Zinger
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.324

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.