Literature DB >> 23537937

Do EEG paradigms work in fMRI? Varying task demands in the visual oddball paradigm: Implications for task design and results interpretation.

Tracy Warbrick1, Martina Reske, N Jon Shah.   

Abstract

We investigate the effects of variations in response requirements on BOLD activation in a visual oddball task and consider implications for fMRI task designs. Sixteen healthy subjects completed 3 runs of a visual oddball task: passive, count and respond. Besides expected activation patterns during passive viewing, we identified joint activations, but more importantly crucial differences between the count and respond versions of the task. Middle frontal gyrus activation was seen in the respond but not the count condition suggesting that this region is associated with action execution rather than the decision-making aspect of the task. In addition, activation observed in the central opercular cortex and parietal operculum in the respond (but not count) condition is likely to reflect integration of the sensory, decision and response processes. We also observed activation in the supplementary motor area (SMA) during count as well as respond. Since the count condition requires no motor planning or response our data provide evidence for an SMA involvement in decision-making. Our study clearly shows that the count and respond versions of the visual oddball task result in different patterns of BOLD activation that could both be attributed to 'target detection' if information on the respective other condition was not available. We also show that considering the elements of a complex task is crucial when transferring it from one imaging modality to another and that a motor response is not always necessary in fMRI studies when the task has been set up appropriately.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23537937     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  A Comparison of Auditory Oddball Responses in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, Basolateral Amygdala, and Auditory Cortex of Macaque.

Authors:  Corrie R Camalier; Kaylee Scarim; Mortimer Mishkin; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Transferring cognitive tasks between brain imaging modalities: implications for task design and results interpretation in FMRI studies.

Authors:  Tracy Warbrick; Martina Reske; N Jon Shah
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Distinct parietal sites mediate the influences of mood, arousal, and their interaction on human recognition memory.

Authors:  Ciara M Greene; Oliver Flannery; David Soto
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

4.  Removal of pulse artefact from EEG data recorded in MR environment at 3T. Setting of ICA parameters for marking artefactual components: application to resting-state data.

Authors:  Eleonora Maggioni; Jorge Arrubla; Tracy Warbrick; Jürgen Dammers; Anna M Bianchi; Gianluigi Reni; Michela Tosetti; Irene Neuner; N Jon Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Impact of a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Event-Related Potentials in Patients with Tic Disorders or Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors.

Authors:  Simon Morand-Beaulieu; Kieron P O'Connor; Maxime Richard; Geneviève Sauvé; Julie B Leclerc; Pierre J Blanchet; Marc E Lavoie
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  P300 Source Localization Contrasts in Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors and Tic Disorders.

Authors:  Geneviève Sauvé; Simon Morand-Beaulieu; Kieron P O'Connor; Pierre J Blanchet; Marc E Lavoie
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-07-01

7.  A Modulatory Effect of Brief Passive Exposure to Non-linguistic Sounds on Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Relevance to Cognitive Performance.

Authors:  Maki S Koyama; Silvia Ortiz-Mantilla; Cynthia P Roesler; Michael P Milham; April A Benasich
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Functional specialization of the left ventral parietal cortex in working memory.

Authors:  Jennifer Langel; Jonathan Hakun; David C Zhu; Susan M Ravizza
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Decreasing predictability of visual motion enhances feed-forward processing in visual cortex when stimuli are behaviorally relevant.

Authors:  Thilo Kellermann; Ruben Scholle; Frank Schneider; Ute Habel
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  MR-compatible, 3.8 inch dual organic light-emitting diode (OLED) in-bore display for functional MRI.

Authors:  YunKyoung Ko; Seong Dae Yun; Suk-Min Hong; Yonghyun Ha; Chang-Hoon Choi; N Jon Shah; Jörg Felder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.