Literature DB >> 2528376

Dynamic interaction between actin and myosin subfragment 1 in the presence of ADP.

M A Geeves1.   

Abstract

The equilibrium and dynamics of the interaction between actin, myosin subfragment 1 (S1), and ADP have been investigated by using actin which has been covalently labeled at Cys-374 with a pyrene group. The results are consistent with actin binding to S1.ADP (M.D) in a two-step reaction, A + M.D K1 equilibrium A-M.D K2 equilibrium A.M.D, in which the pyrene fluorescence only monitors the second step. In this model, K1 = 2.3 X 10(4) M-1 (k+1 = 4.6 X 10(4) M-1 s-1) and K2 = 10 (k+2 less than or equal to 4 s-1); i.e., both steps are relatively slow compared to the maximum turnover of the ATPase reaction. ADP dissociates from both M.D and A-M.D at 2 s-1 and from A.M.D at greater than or equal to 500 s-1; therefore, actin only accelerates the release of product from the A.M.D state. This model is consistent with the actomyosin ATPase model proposed by Geeves et al. [(1984) J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 5, 351]. The results suggest that A-M.D cannot break down at a rate greater than 4 s-1 by dissociation of ADP, by dissociation of actin, or by isomerizing to A.M.D. It is therefore unlikely to be significantly occupied in a rapidly contracting muscle, but it may have a role in a muscle contracting against a load where the ATPase rate is markedly inhibited. Under these conditions, this complex may have a role in maintaining tension with a low ATP turnover rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2528376     DOI: 10.1021/bi00440a024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  31 in total

1.  A flash photolysis fluorescence/light scattering apparatus for use with sub microgram quantities of muscle proteins.

Authors:  S Weiss; I Chizhov; M A Geeves
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Kinetic studies on the effects of ADP and ionic strength on the interaction between myosin subfragment-1 and actin: implications for load-sensitivity and regulation of the crossbridge cycle.

Authors:  P B Conibear
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Interaction of myosin with F-actin: time-dependent changes at the interface are not slow.

Authors:  J Van Dijk; F Céline; T Barman; P Chaussepied
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  The structural basis of muscle contraction.

Authors:  K C Holmes; M A Geeves
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The biochemical kinetics underlying actin movement generated by one and many skeletal muscle myosin molecules.

Authors:  Josh E Baker; Christine Brosseau; Peteranne B Joel; David M Warshaw
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A novel pressure-jump apparatus for the microvolume analysis of protein-ligand and protein-protein interactions: its application to nucleotide binding to skeletal-muscle and smooth-muscle myosin subfragment-1.

Authors:  David S Pearson; Georg Holtermann; Patricia Ellison; Christine Cremo; Michael A Geeves
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  The working stroke upon myosin-nucleotide complexes binding to actin.

Authors:  Walter Steffen; David Smith; John Sleep
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The dynamics of actin and myosin association and the crossbridge model of muscle contraction.

Authors:  M A Geeves
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  CaATP prolongs strong actomyosin binding and promotes futile myosin stroke.

Authors:  Jinghua Ge; Akhil Gargey; Irina V Nesmelova; Yuri E Nesmelov
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Effects of thyroxine on myosin isoform expression and mechanical properties in guinea-pig smooth muscle.

Authors:  Mia Löfgren; Katarina Fagher; Geoffrey Woodard; Anders Arner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.