Literature DB >> 10730576

Kinetic studies on the effects of ADP and ionic strength on the interaction between myosin subfragment-1 and actin: implications for load-sensitivity and regulation of the crossbridge cycle.

P B Conibear1.   

Abstract

The dynamics of the interaction of fast skeletal muscle myosin subfragment-1 with pyrene-labelled actin were examined using both stopped-flow and pressure relaxation methods. The data suggest a four-step model i.e.: A + M.(N)(K0)<-->A approximately M.(N)(K1)<-->A - M.(N)(K2)<-->A.M.(N)(K3)<-->A.M.(N)#. ADP weakens the acto-S1 affinity via a reduction in Ko, with no apparent effect on K1 and no effect on K2, whilst k(+2) and k(-2) are both markedly reduced. Increased ionic strength reduces both K0 and k(+2) with no major effect on k(+1). Step 3 represents an extension to previous models and is ADP-dependent. The present work is discussed in relation to earlier studies which led to somewhat different conclusions (Taylor EW (1991) J Biol Chem 266: 294-302; Geeves MA (1989) Biochemistry 28: 5864-5871). It is likely that the interaction proceeds via formation of a disordered complex stabilised by ionic interactions (corresponding to step 0), followed by a disordered-to-ordered transition involving additional hydrophobic contacts (step 1) after which further contacts of both types are made coupled to internal conformational changes (steps 2 and 3). Step 3 could have a role in extending the lifetime of force-generating crossbridges and limiting ATP turnover during contraction against a load, and may be equivalent to a structural change observed in recent cryo-EM studies on the smooth muscle system (Whittaker M, Wilsonkubalek EM, Smith JE, Faust L, Milligan RA and Sweeney HL (1995) Nature 378: 748-751). Cooperative interactions between the two myosin heads also appear to have a role in this putative latch mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10730576     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005696017544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil        ISSN: 0142-4319            Impact factor:   2.698


  47 in total

1.  Energetics and mechanism of actomyosin adenosine triphosphatase.

Authors:  H D White; E W Taylor
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1976-12-28       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Mechanism of actomyosin ATPase and the problem of muscle contraction.

Authors:  E W Taylor
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Biochem       Date:  1979

3.  The influence of anions, ionic strength and organic solvents on the interaction between actin and myosin subfragment 1.

Authors:  M A Geeves; W H Goldmann
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.407

4.  Active and rigor muscle stiffness [proceedings].

Authors:  Y E Goldman; R M Simmons
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Two different rigor complexes of myosin subfragment 1 and actin.

Authors:  O A Andreev; A L Andreeva; V S Markin; J Borejdo
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-11-16       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Preparation of myosin and its subfragments from rabbit skeletal muscle.

Authors:  S S Margossian; S Lowey
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  The rates of formation and dissociation of actin-myosin complexes. Effects of solvent, temperature, nucleotide binding and head-head interactions.

Authors:  S B Marston
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1982-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Intrinsic fluorescence of actin.

Authors:  S S Lehrer; G Kerwar
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1972-03-28       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  A 35-A movement of smooth muscle myosin on ADP release.

Authors:  M Whittaker; E M Wilson-Kubalek; J E Smith; L Faust; R A Milligan; H L Sweeney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  ADP dissociation from actomyosin subfragment 1 is sufficiently slow to limit the unloaded shortening velocity in vertebrate muscle.

Authors:  R F Siemankowski; M O Wiseman; H D White
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Hill model for binding myosin S1 to regulated actin is not equivalent to the McKillop-Geeves model.

Authors:  Srboljub M Mijailovich; Xiaochuan Li; R Hugh Griffiths; Michael A Geeves
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Atomistic Models from Orientation and Distance Constraints Using EPR of a Bifunctional Spin Label.

Authors:  Benjamin P Binder; Andrew R Thompson; David D Thomas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Comparing models with one versus multiple myosin-binding sites per actin target zone: The power of simplicity.

Authors:  Alf Månsson
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.086

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.