Literature DB >> 25283452

Assessing outcomes in body contouring.

Anne F Klassen1, Stefan J Cano2, Amie Scott3, Elena Tsangaris4, Andrea L Pusic3.   

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are questionnaires designed to measure outcomes of importance to patients from their perspective. This article describes the methods used to develop a new PRO instrument for obese patients and patients having bariatric and cosmetic body contouring surgery. The BODY-Q is composed of 19 newly designed scales that measure: (1) appearance; (2) health-related quality of life; and (3) process of care. Recommended guidelines for PRO instrument development were followed to ensure that the BODY-Q meets requirements of regulatory bodies. The BODY-Q is currently being field-tested in an international study.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic surgery; BODY-Q; Bariatric surgery; Body contouring; Obesity; Outcomes; Psychometrics; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25283452     DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2014.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Plast Surg        ISSN: 0094-1298            Impact factor:   2.017


  15 in total

1.  FACE-Q Satisfaction with Appearance Scores from Close to 1000 Facial Aesthetic Patients.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Development and Evaluation of the Quality of Life for Obesity Surgery (QOLOS) Questionnaire.

Authors:  Astrid Müller; Ross D Crosby; Janine Selle; Alexandra Osterhus; Hinrich Köhler; Julian W Mall; Thorsten Meyer; Martina de Zwaan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  The postpartum abdomen: psychology, surgery and quality of life.

Authors:  S-J Edmondson; D A Ross
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Self-Report Scales to Measure Expectations and Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress in Patients Seeking Cosmetic Treatments.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Amy Alderman; Charles East; Lydia Badia; Stephen B Baker; Sam Robson; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  FACE-Q Eye Module for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cosmetic Eye Treatments.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; James C Grotting; Stephen B Baker; Jean Carruthers; Alastair Carruthers; Nancy Van Laeken; Jonathan M Sykes; Jonathan A Schwitzer; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

6.  A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Evangelos Keramidas; Stavroula Rodopoulou; Maria-Ioanna Gavala
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  The daily Self-Weighing for Obesity Management in Primary Care Study: Rationale, design and methodology.

Authors:  Gareth R Dutton; Amber W Kinsey; Carrie R Howell; Maria Pisu; Amy E Dobelstein; David B Allison; Pengcheng Xun; David A Levitsky; Kevin Fontaine
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.261

8.  Danish translation and linguistic validation of the BODY-Q: a description of the process.

Authors:  Lotte Poulsen; Michael Rose; Anne Klassen; Kirsten K Roessler; Jens Ahm Sørensen
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2016-10-08

9.  The BODY-Q: A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Weight Loss and Body Contouring Treatments.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Amy Alderman; Mark Soldin; Achilles Thoma; Sam Robson; Manraj Kaur; Athanasios Papas; Nancy Van Laeken; Valerie H Taylor; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-04-13

10.  Patient Expectations of Bariatric and Body Contouring Surgery.

Authors:  Lotte Poulsen; Anne Klassen; Sabrina Jhanwar; Andrea Pusic; Kirsten K Roessler; Michael Rose; Jens Ahm Sørensen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.