Literature DB >> 25282051

Cross-modal repetition effects in the mu rhythm indicate tactile mirroring during action observation.

Michel-Pierre Coll1, Geoffrey Bird2, Caroline Catmur3, Clare Press4.   

Abstract

Similar cortical activations during the experience and observation of touch suggest the presence of a tactile mirroring system. However, the specificity of observation-related activity - i.e., whether observation excites the same representations as experience of that specific tactile stimulation - is still to be established. Furthermore, central mu rhythms are attenuated during the experience and observation of touch, and also during action observation and execution, making it unclear whether they index processing of predominantly tactile or motor features of observed actions. The present study used an electroencephalography (EEG) cross-modal repetition paradigm to assess the relative tactile and motor specificity of mu attenuation during action observation. Two experiments were carried out during which participants executed and observed actions in alternation, and the repetition of either tactile or motor features of the actions were manipulated. The mu signal over central electrodes varied as a function of tactile repetition, consistent with the claim of a tactile mirroring system and its reflection in the mu signal. Of note was the fact that mu attenuation was sensitive only to manipulation of tactile - not motor - properties of actions, suggesting that caution should be employed when interpreting mu effects during action observation as reflective of motor mirroring.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; Mirror neurons; Mu rhythm; Somatosensory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25282051     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  15 in total

1.  The role of empathy in the neural responses to observed human social touch.

Authors:  Leehe Peled-Avron; Einat Levy-Gigi; Gal Richter-Levin; Nachshon Korem; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Investigating the effects of pain observation on approach and withdrawal actions.

Authors:  Carl Michael Galang; Mina Pichtikova; Taryn Sanders; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Automatic attribution of social coordination information to chasing scenes: evidence from mu suppression.

Authors:  Jipeng Duan; Zhangxiang Yang; Xiaoyan He; Meixuan Shao; Jun Yin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Crossmodal Classification of Mu Rhythm Activity during Action Observation and Execution Suggests Specificity to Somatosensory Features of Actions.

Authors:  Michel-Pierre Coll; Clare Press; Hannah Hobson; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Socioeconomic status and self-other processing: socioeconomic status predicts interference in the automatic imitation task.

Authors:  Sumeet Farwaha; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Body representations as indexed by oscillatory EEG activities in the context of tactile novelty processing.

Authors:  Guannan Shen; Andrew N Meltzoff; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Clarifying the relationship between trait empathy and action-based resonance indexed by EEG mu-rhythm suppression.

Authors:  Marissa A DiGirolamo; Jeremy C Simon; Kristiana M Hubley; Alek Kopulsky; Jennifer N Gutsell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Social Coordination Information in Dynamic Chase Modulates EEG Mu Rhythm.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Xiaowei Ding; Haokui Xu; Feng Zhang; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The interpretation of mu suppression as an index of mirror neuron activity: past, present and future.

Authors:  Hannah M Hobson; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Mu suppression - A good measure of the human mirror neuron system?

Authors:  Hannah M Hobson; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.