| Literature DB >> 25279657 |
Vaibhav Kumar Shukla1, Ashish Kabra1, Diva Maheshwari1, Rahul Yadav1, Anupam Jain1, Sarita Tripathi1, Shoichiro Ono2, Dinesh Kumar3, Ashish Arora1.
Abstract
The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has two ADF (actin-depolymerizing factor)/cofilin isoforms, UNC-60A and UNC-60B, which are expressed by the unc60 gene by alternative splicing. UNC-60A has higher activity to cause net depolymerization, and to inhibit polymerization, than UNC-60B. UNC-60B, on the other hand, shows much stronger severing activity than UNC-60A. To understand the structural basis of their functional differences, we have determined the solution structures of UNC-60A and UNC-60B proteins and characterized their backbone dynamics. Both UNC-60A and UNC-60B show a conserved ADF/cofilin fold. The G-actin (globular actin)-binding regions of the two proteins are structurally and dynamically conserved. Accordingly, UNC-60A and UNC-60B individually bind to rabbit muscle ADP-G-actin with high affinities, with Kd values of 32.25 nM and 8.62 nM respectively. The primary differences between these strong and weak severing proteins were observed in the orientation and dynamics of the F-actin (filamentous actin)-binding loop (F-loop). In the strong severing activity isoform UNC-60B, the orientation of the F-loop was towards the recently identified F-loop-binding region on F-actin, and the F-loop was relatively more flexible with 14 residues showing motions on a nanosecond-picosecond timescale. In contrast, in the weak severing protein isoform UNC-60A, the orientation of the F-loop was away from the F-loop-binding region and inclined towards its own C-terminal and strand β6. It was also relatively less flexible with only five residues showing motions on a nanosecond-picosecond timescale. These differences in structure and dynamics seem to directly correlate with the differential F-actin site-binding and severing properties of UNC-60A and UNC-60B, and other related ADF/cofilin proteins.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25279657 PMCID: PMC4325984 DOI: 10.1042/BJ20140923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem J ISSN: 0264-6021 Impact factor: 3.857