Literature DB >> 25278504

A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets.

Derek P Tittensor1, Matt Walpole2, Samantha L L Hill2, Daniel G Boyce3, Gregory L Britten4, Neil D Burgess5, Stuart H M Butchart6, Paul W Leadley7, Eugenie C Regan2, Rob Alkemade8, Roswitha Baumung9, Céline Bellard7, Lex Bouwman10, Nadine J Bowles-Newark2, Anna M Chenery2, William W L Cheung11, Villy Christensen11, H David Cooper12, Annabel R Crowther2, Matthew J R Dixon2, Alessandro Galli13, Valérie Gaveau14, Richard D Gregory15, Nicolas L Gutierrez16, Tim L Hirsch17, Robert Höft12, Stephanie R Januchowski-Hartley18, Marion Karmann19, Cornelia B Krug20, Fiona J Leverington21, Jonathan Loh22, Rik Kutsch Lojenga23, Kelly Malsch2, Alexandra Marques24, David H W Morgan25, Peter J Mumby26, Tim Newbold2, Kieran Noonan-Mooney12, Shyama N Pagad27, Bradley C Parks28, Henrique M Pereira24, Tim Robertson17, Carlo Rondinini29, Luca Santini29, Jörn P W Scharlemann30, Stefan Schindler31, U Rashid Sumaila11, Louise S L Teh11, Jennifer van Kolck8, Piero Visconti32, Yimin Ye9.   

Abstract

In 2010, the international community, under the auspices of the Convention on Biological Diversity, agreed on 20 biodiversity-related "Aichi Targets" to be achieved within a decade. We provide a comprehensive mid-term assessment of progress toward these global targets using 55 indicator data sets. We projected indicator trends to 2020 using an adaptive statistical framework that incorporated the specific properties of individual time series. On current trajectories, results suggest that despite accelerating policy and management responses to the biodiversity crisis, the impacts of these efforts are unlikely to be reflected in improved trends in the state of biodiversity by 2020. We highlight areas of societal endeavor requiring additional efforts to achieve the Aichi Targets, and provide a baseline against which to assess future progress.
Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25278504     DOI: 10.1126/science.1257484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  125 in total

1.  Socio-economic and ecological impacts of global protected area expansion plans.

Authors:  Piero Visconti; Michel Bakkenes; Robert J Smith; Lucas Joppa; Rachel E Sykes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Rarity in mass extinctions and the future of ecosystems.

Authors:  Pincelli M Hull; Simon A F Darroch; Douglas H Erwin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Global patterns in threats to vertebrates by biological invasions.

Authors:  C Bellard; P Genovesi; J M Jeschke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Aichi targets: Protect biodiversity, not just area.

Authors:  Megan Barnes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Conservation: Mind the gaps.

Authors:  Thomas M Brooks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The changing form of Antarctic biodiversity.

Authors:  Steven L Chown; Andrew Clarke; Ceridwen I Fraser; S Craig Cary; Katherine L Moon; Melodie A McGeoch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity.

Authors:  Tim Newbold; Lawrence N Hudson; Samantha L L Hill; Sara Contu; Igor Lysenko; Rebecca A Senior; Luca Börger; Dominic J Bennett; Argyrios Choimes; Ben Collen; Julie Day; Adriana De Palma; Sandra Díaz; Susy Echeverria-Londoño; Melanie J Edgar; Anat Feldman; Morgan Garon; Michelle L K Harrison; Tamera Alhusseini; Daniel J Ingram; Yuval Itescu; Jens Kattge; Victoria Kemp; Lucinda Kirkpatrick; Michael Kleyer; David Laginha Pinto Correia; Callum D Martin; Shai Meiri; Maria Novosolov; Yuan Pan; Helen R P Phillips; Drew W Purves; Alexandra Robinson; Jake Simpson; Sean L Tuck; Evan Weiher; Hannah J White; Robert M Ewers; Georgina M Mace; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Management effectiveness and conservation prioritizing the protected areas using RAPPAM methodology (case study: Khuzestan province).

Authors:  Fakhrieh Mohseni; Gholamreza Sabzghabaei; Soolmaz Dashti
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Predicting plant conservation priorities on a global scale.

Authors:  Tara A Pelletier; Bryan C Carstens; David C Tank; Jack Sullivan; Anahí Espíndola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Null expectations for disease dynamics in shrinking habitat: dilution or amplification?

Authors:  Christina L Faust; Andrew P Dobson; Nicole Gottdenker; Laura S P Bloomfield; Hamish I McCallum; Thomas R Gillespie; Maria Diuk-Wasser; Raina K Plowright
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.