Literature DB >> 25278207

The interaction of stress and urgency urinary incontinence and its effect on quality of life.

Vatché A Minassian1, Haiyan Sun, Xiaowei S Yan, Deseraé N Clarke, Walter F Stewart.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to estimate the impact of stress and urgency urinary incontinence (UI) on the quality of life (QOL), and to determine whether the impact varies according to UI severity.
METHODS: We used data from the General Longitudinal Overactive Bladder Evaluation-UI study in women. Stress and urgency UI symptom severity scores ranged from 0 to 8. We used logistic regression to test the relation among different severity levels of stress and urgency UI, and their interaction with the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). This was categorized according to percentage ranges as 0-40% (reference), 41-80%, and 81-100%.
RESULTS: Both stress and urgency UI were significantly associated with IIQ-7. Higher scores had higher odds ratios (ORs). The OR for urgency vs stress UI was greater at the same severity level. For instance, comparing IIQ-7 quintiles (0-40% vs 41-80%), the OR for an association with an urgency UI score of 5-6 was 5.27 (95% CI = 3.78-7.33) vs 2.76 (95% CI = 2.07-3.68) for a stress UI score of 5-6. Both UI subtypes were more strongly related to the upper (81-100%) than the to the lower (41-80%) quintiles. There was a strong positive urgency UI and stress UI interaction with the upper (i.e., 81-100%) but not the two next lower (41-80%) quintiles.
CONCLUSION: The impact of UI subtypes on QOL varies according to the score of IIQ-7, stress and urgency UI, and their interaction. Urgency vs stress UI has a stronger impact. The effect is greatest for high IIQ-7 scores with a significant share mediated by the interaction of the two UI subtypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25278207     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2505-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  28 in total

1.  Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in non-surgical patients.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Emily S Lukacz; Kathryn Burgio; Philippe Zimmern; Peggy Norton; Wendy Leng; Harry Johnson; Stephen Kraus; Anne Stoddard
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 2.  Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling populations.

Authors:  A R Herzog; N H Fultz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines.

Authors:  S Eaker; R Bergström; A Bergström; H O Adami; O Nyren
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults.

Authors:  A R Herzog; A C Diokno; M B Brown; D P Normolle; B M Brock
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1990-03

5.  The prevalence of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  I Milsom
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Impact of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder on quality of life.

Authors:  Francesca Chiaffarino; Fabio Parazzini; Maurizio Lavezzari; Vincenzo Giambanco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests.

Authors:  H Sandvik; A Seim; A Vanvik; S Hunskaar
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 8.  Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in women having stress incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Anne Stoddard; Holly Richter; Philippe Zimmern; Pamela Moalli; Stephen R Kraus; Peggy Norton; Emily Lukacz; Larry Sirls; Harry Johnson
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 9.  Why do stress and urge incontinence co-occur much more often than expected?

Authors:  Vatche A Minassian; Walter F Stewart; Annemarie G Hirsch
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-06-05

10.  Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States.

Authors:  W F Stewart; J B Van Rooyen; G W Cundiff; P Abrams; A R Herzog; R Corey; T L Hunt; A J Wein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comprehensive Review of Effective Application of Questionnaires for Clinical Research on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms With Translation and Cultural Adaptation to the Korean Language.

Authors:  Jungyo Suh; Seung-June Oh; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Lower urinary tract symptoms and functional ability in older adults: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kyo Takahashi; Tomoki Tanaka; Yasuyo Yoshizawa; Mahiro Fujisaki-Sueda-Sakai; Bo-Kyung Son; Katsuya Iijima
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  The Effect of Urinary Incontinence on Quality of Life of Women at Childbearing Age in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Marwan A Bakarman; Sadiah Saeed Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-07-19

4.  Randomized controlled trial for the efficacy of electroacupuncture in the treatment of urge urinary incontinence: A clinical study protocol.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Shuangjin Qi; Xianming Wu; Na Zhi; Ting He; Miaoxian Shen; Shuo Yang; Qian Mo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.