| Literature DB >> 25277780 |
Kristin VanderEnde, Sajeda Amin, Ruchira Tabassum Naved1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While the majority of research in Bangladesh has focused on intimate partner violence (IPV) against women, less is known about the correlates of physical violence against unmarried female adolescents, particularly community-level characteristics that may increase their risk of experiencing violence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25277780 PMCID: PMC4195913 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Characteristics of sample
| Unmarried female adolescents a | |
|---|---|
| n = 4377 | |
|
| |
| Yes | 1661 (37.9%) |
|
|
|
|
| 13.3 (2.5) |
|
| |
| Non- poor (highest 60%) | 2,679 (61.2%) |
|
| |
| Muslim | 3770 (86.1%) |
|
| |
| Yes | 1445 (33.0%) |
aUnmarried adolescents aged 10–19 years.
bRespondents with missing data were excluded from multi-level logistic regression models.
Characteristics of communities
| Communities (n = 361) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| % unmarried female adolescents reporting any past year physical violence | 38.5 (22.4) | 0 - 100 |
| % literate (adult females) | 36.6 (17.7) | 5 - 92 |
| % accepting of physical punishment of adolescents | 50.6 (17.5) | 9 – 95 |
| % households belonging to an NGO | 32.1 (16.0) | 0 - 78 |
| Wealth ranking (n,%) |
|
|
| Non-poor (highest 60%) | 217 | 60.1% |
| Area (n,%) | ||
| Rural | 227 | 76.7% |
Multi-level logistic models for any physical violence against unmarried female adolescents in Bangladesh
| aOR (95% CI) Unmarried female adolescents | |
|---|---|
| n = 4370 | |
| Intercept | 0.50 (0.41-0.61)* |
|
| |
| Community wealth (poor ref) | |
| Non-poor | 1.28 (0.96-1.72) |
| % literate (female) | 0.68 (0.26-1.79) |
| % accepting of physical punishment of adolescents | 5.42 (2.52-11.64)* |
| % households belonging to NGO | 1.99 (0.88-4.54) |
| Area (rural ref) | |
| Urban | 0.98 (0.69-1.39) |
|
| |
| Age | 0.65 (0.63-0.68)* |
| Religion (non-Muslim ref) | |
| Muslim | 1.20 (0.91-1.58) |
| Household wealth (poor ref) | |
| Non-poor | 1.00 (0.84-1.19) |
| NGO membership (non-membership ref) | |
| Household member of NGO | 1.05 (0.88-1.25) |
|
| |
| Community level | 0.53 (0.10) |
| District level | 0.43 (0.12) |
*p < 0.01, †Significance of random effects not estimated.