| Literature DB >> 25276786 |
Paolo Vinciguerra1, Rita Mencucci2, Vito Romano3, Eberhard Spoerl4, Fabrizio I Camesasca1, Eleonora Favuzza2, Claudio Azzolini5, Rodolfo Mastropasqua6, Riccardo Vinciguerra7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare biomechanical effect, riboflavin penetration and distribution in transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking with iontophoresis (I-CXL), with standard cross linking (S-CXL) and current transepithelial protocol (TE-CXL).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25276786 PMCID: PMC4167647 DOI: 10.1155/2014/404587
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Iontophoresis applicator for human donor corneas.
Figure 2Corneal section preparation for MALDI-IMS. Corneas of enucleated globes were cut in frontal sections (slice thickness about 20 μm) using a cryostat-microtome.
Figure 3Example of a MALDI-MS imaging of a corneal section soaked with riboflavin, with the colour scale (a). Haematoxylin-eosin stained samples after MALDI-MS imaging and matrix removal (b). Example of MALDI-IMS spectrum of riboflavin that describe one point of the plot (c).
Allocation of rabbits in the treatment groups, each rabbit showed right eye treated and left eye untreated.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of corneas untreated | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Number of corneas treated | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Riboflavin | Ricrolin TE | Ricrolin Prep A | Ricrolin + | Ricrolin TE |
| Epithelium debridement | NO | NO | NO | NO |
| Soaking time (minutes) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 30 |
| Iontophoresis | YES | YES | YES | NO |
| Irradiation power (mW/cm2) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Irradiation time (minutes) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Allocation of human corneas in the treatment groups.
| S-CXL | TE-CXL | I-CXL 3 mW | I-CXL 10 mW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of corneas | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Riboflavin | Ricrolin | Ricrolin TE | Ricrolin + | Ricrolin + |
| Epithelium debridement | YES | NO | NO | NO |
| Soaking time (minutes) | 30 | 30 | 10 | 10 |
| Iontophoresis | NO | NO | YES | YES |
| Irradiation power (mW/cm2) | 3 | 3 | 30 | 10 |
| Irradiation time (minutes) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 9 |
Figure 4Standard group: MALDI-MS Imaging (a and b) and haematoxylin-eosin staining (c and d) of two corneal samples of two different eyes.
Figure 5Transepithelial group: MALDI-MS imaging (a and b) and haematoxylin-eosin staining (c and d) of two corneal samples of two different eyes.
Figure 6Iontophoresis group: MALDI-MS imaging (a and b) and haematoxylin-eosin staining (c and d) of two corneal samples of two different eyes.
Figure 7Stress-strain measurements of rabbit corneas.
Figure 8Stress-strain measurements of human corneas.
Stress value for 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% strains in rabbit corneas.
| Groups | Stress at 4% (103 Pa) | Stress at 6% (103 Pa) | Stress at 8% (103 Pa) | Stress at 10% (103 Pa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | ||||
| Untreated | 55.7 ± 17.16 | 101 ± 37.72 | 171.3 ± 73.89 | 270.3 ± 119.1 |
| Treated | 51.3 ± 11.8 | 93.7 ± 29.5 | 157.7 ± 59.7 | 249.0 ± 100.5 |
| Group 2 | ||||
| Untreated | 57.3 ± 13.2 | 104.7 ± 31.0 | 181.0 ± 59.1 | 287.7 ± 88.9 |
| Treated | 56.3 ± 6.6 | 96.7 ± 12.7 | 164.0 ± 27.4 | 254.3 ± 37.8 |
| Group 3 | ||||
| Untreated | 52.7 ± 9.6 | 94.7 ± 16.5 | 160 ± 25.2 | 260.7 ± 40.5 |
| Treated | 88.3 ± 26.3 | 184.3 ± 75.8 | 351.7 ± 171 | 603.3 ± 316.7 |
| Group 4 | ||||
| Untreated | 63.7 ± 14.0 | 112.7 ± 22.4 | 187.3 ± 31.6 | 292.7 ± 45.5 |
| Treated | 51.7 ± 15.3 | 87.0 ± 26.9 | 134.0 ± 43.3 | 201.3 ± 60.2 |
Legenda. E: calculated Young's modulus.
Stress value for 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% strains in human corneas.
| Groups | Stress at 4% (103 Pa) | Stress at 6% (103 Pa) | Stress at 8% (103 Pa) | Stress at 10% (103 Pa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | ||||
| S-CXL | 194.3 ± 86.7 | 349.3 ± 193.8 | 574.3 ± 309.9 | 850.3 ± 487.4 |
| Group B | ||||
| TE-CXL | 114 ± 32.4 | 200.6 ± 50.8 | 308.6 ± 58.1 | 437.6 ± 53.4 |
| Group C | ||||
| I-CXL 3 mW | 123.6 ± 47.5 | 238.3 ± 57.2 | 388.3 ± 44.8 | 576 ± 45 |
| Group D | ||||
| I-CXL 10 mW | 150.3 ± 61.6 | 276.9 ± 115.4 | 449.7 ± 184.4 | 661.75 ± 280.9 |
Legenda. E: calculated Young's modulus.
Figure 9Young's modulus at 10% strain of rabbit corneas.
Figure 10Young's modulus at 10% strain of human corneas.