Literature DB >> 23790530

Transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus: 24-month clinical results.

Aldo Caporossi1, Cosimo Mazzotta, Anna Lucia Paradiso, Stefano Baiocchi, Davide Marigliani, Tomaso Caporossi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical results of transepithelial collagen crosslinking (CXL) in patients 26 years and younger with progressive keratoconus suitable for epithelium-off (epi-off) CXL.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
METHODS: The study included 26 eyes (26 patients) treated by transepithelial (epithelium-on) CXL. The mean age was 22 years (range 11 to 26 years) (10 younger than 18 years; 16 between 19 years and 26 years). Preoperative and postoperative examinations included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, simulated maximum keratometry (K), coma and spherical aberration, and corneal optical coherence tomography optical pachymetry. The solution for transepithelial CXL (Ricrolin TE) comprised riboflavin 0.1%, dextran 15.0%, trometamol (Tris), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Ultraviolet-A treatment was performed with the Caporossi Baiocchi Mazzotta X Linker Vega at 3 mW/cm(2).
RESULTS: After relative improvement in the first 3 to 6 months, the UDVA and CDVA gradually returned to baseline preoperative values. After 12 months of stability, the simulated maximum K value worsened at 24 months. Coma aberration showed no statistically significant change. Spherical aberration increased at 24 months. Pachymetry showed a progressive, statistically significant decrease at 24 months. Fifty percent of pediatric patients were retreated with epi-off CXL due to significant deterioration of all parameters after 12 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Functional results after transepithelial CXL showed keratoconus instability, in particular in pediatric patients 18 years old and younger; there was also functional regression in patients between 19 years and 26 years old after 24 months of follow-up. mentioned.
Copyright © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23790530     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  64 in total

1.  Standard, transepithelial and iontophoresis corneal cross-linking: clinical analysis of three surgical techniques.

Authors:  Settimio Rossi; Carmine Santamaria; Rosa Boccia; Luigi De Rosa; Francesco Maria D'Alterio; Francesca Simonelli; Giuseppe De Rosa
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  New perspectives in keratoconus treatment: an update on iontophoresis-assisted corneal collagen crosslinking.

Authors:  Paolo Vinciguerra; Alessio Montericcio; Fiammetta Catania; Giovanni Fossati; Raffaele Raimondi; Emanuela Filomena Legrottaglie; Riccardo Vinciguerra
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Clinical outcomes at one year following keratoconus treatment with accelerated transepithelial cross-linking.

Authors:  Alberto Artola; David P Piñero; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Roberto Soto-Negro; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking using a customized epithelial debridement technique in keratoconic eyes with thin corneas.

Authors:  Nurullah Cagil; Ozge Sarac; Gamze Dereli Can; Emine Akcay; Mehmet Erol Can
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis.

Authors:  Nacim Bouheraoua; Lea Jouve; Vincent Borderie; Laurent Laroche
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Comparison of corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus.

Authors:  Bo-Wen Ouyang; Hui Ding; Han Wang; Zhen-Duo Yang; Tan Zhong; Hong-Ming Fan; Xing-Wu Zhong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 7.  [Riboflavin UVA crosslinking in progressive keratoconus].

Authors:  P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 8.  Safety and efficacy of epithelium removal and transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus.

Authors:  Z Shalchi; X Wang; M A Nanavaty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Corneal stromal elasticity and viscoelasticity assessed by atomic force microscopy after different cross linking protocols.

Authors:  Janice Dias; Vasilios F Diakonis; Michael Lorenzo; Felipe Gonzalez; Kevin Porras; Simone Douglas; Marcel Avila; Sonia H Yoo; Noël M Ziebarth
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 10.  Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabrina Mukhtar; Balamurali K Ambati
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.