Mitra Edraki1, Maryam Paran2, Sedigheh Montaseri3, Mostajab Razavi Nejad4, Zohre Montaseri3. 1. Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 3. Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Maintaining body temperature and reducing stress are important challenges in bathing preterm infants. Swaddle bathing, which includes in itself the principles of developmental care, can be used as a low-stress and appropriate bathing method for premature infants. Given the limitations of the researches carried out on this bathing method, the present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the effects of swaddled and conventional bathing methods on body temperature and crying duration in premature infants. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial study, 50 premature infants hospitalized in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) who were eligible for the study were divided by random allocation into two experimental and control groups. The infants in the experimental group were bathed using the swaddle bathing method and the infants in the control group were bathed using the conventional bathing method. Body temperature was measured 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the bath. To record the crying, the infants' faces were filmed during the bath. The data were analyzed using chi-squared test, independent t-test, paired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean temperature loss was significantly less in the swaddle-bathed newborns compared to the conventionally-bathed newborns. Furthermore, crying time was significantly less in the experimental group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Given the positive effect of swaddled bathing in maintaining body temperature and reducing stress, it can be used as an appropriate bathing method in NICU.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Maintaining body temperature and reducing stress are important challenges in bathing preterm infants. Swaddle bathing, which includes in itself the principles of developmental care, can be used as a low-stress and appropriate bathing method for premature infants. Given the limitations of the researches carried out on this bathing method, the present study was conducted with the aim of comparing the effects of swaddled and conventional bathing methods on body temperature and crying duration in premature infants. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial study, 50 premature infants hospitalized in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) who were eligible for the study were divided by random allocation into two experimental and control groups. The infants in the experimental group were bathed using the swaddle bathing method and the infants in the control group were bathed using the conventional bathing method. Body temperature was measured 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the bath. To record the crying, the infants' faces were filmed during the bath. The data were analyzed using chi-squared test, independent t-test, paired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The mean temperature loss was significantly less in the swaddle-bathed newborns compared to the conventionally-bathed newborns. Furthermore, crying time was significantly less in the experimental group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Given the positive effect of swaddled bathing in maintaining body temperature and reducing stress, it can be used as an appropriate bathing method in NICU.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bath; Body temperature; Crying; Infant; Premature
Authors: Laurent Renesme; A Allen; F Audeoud; C Bouvard; A Brandicourt; C Casper; L Cayemaex; H Denoual; M A Duboz; A Evrard; C Fichtner; C J Fischer-Fumeaux; L Girard; F Gonnaud; D Haumont; P Hüppi; N Knezovic; E Laprugne-Garcia; S Legouais; F Mons; V Pelofy; J C Picaud; V Pierrat; P Pladys; A Reynaud; G Souet; G Thiriez; P Tourneux; M Touzet; P Truffert; C Zaoui; E Zana-Taieb; C Zores; J Sizun; P Kuhn Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: S L Hall; M T Hynan; R Phillips; S Lassen; J W Craig; E Goyer; R F Hatfield; H Cohen Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Catarina Firmino; Marlene Rodrigues; Sofia Franco; Judicília Ferreira; Ana Rita Simões; Cidália Castro; Júlio Belo Fernandes Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 4.614