| Literature DB >> 25276343 |
Tavarekere N Nagaraja1, Kelly A Keenan1, Madhava P Aryal2, James R Ewing3, Saarang Gopinath1, Varun S Nadig1, Sukruth Shashikumar1, Robert A Knight4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limiting expansion of the ischemic core lesion by reinstating blood flow and protecting the penumbral cells is a priority in acute stroke treatment. However, at present, methods are not available for effective drug delivery to the ischemic penumbra. To address these issues this study compared the extravasation and subsequent interstitial spread of a magnetic resonance contrast agent (MRCA) beyond the ischemic core into the surrounding brain in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion for bolus injection and step-down infusion (SDI) protocols.Entities:
Keywords: Blood–brain barrier; Brain drug delivery; Penumbra; Perfusion-diffusion mismatch; Stroke
Year: 2014 PMID: 25276343 PMCID: PMC4177725 DOI: 10.1186/2045-8118-11-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fluids Barriers CNS ISSN: 2045-8118
Figure 1Images to exemplify the areas of ADC and CBF deficits (demarcated by white outlines) during occlusion (top row), and after reperfusion (middle row). Images were acquired 1.5-2.5 h post-stroke and 0.5-3.0 h post re-perfusion. Note the expansion of ADC lesion by a small extent and the partial restitution of CBF after reperfusion indicated by the appearance of relatively brighter pixels in the CBF deficit region. The animals were sacrificed following the MRCA enhanced imaging series (performed between 2.5 h and 3.0 h post-reperfusion) at approximately 3 h post-reperfusion and tissue sections were taken for histopathological assessment. The bottom photomicrograph shows the Nissl stained brain section from the same animal and demonstrates the stroke lesion (white outline) as seen on histopathology. It approximates the area of CBF deficit still persisting after reperfusion. An increase in Nissl staining intensity is faintly visible from medial to lateral part of the lesion, with the area of low intensity staining roughly matching the ADC lesion (regions marked by dotted lines).
Figure 2Quantification of ADC and CBF lesion areas. The pixels encompassing these lesions are expressed as a fraction of the ipsilateral hemisphere corrected for swelling. ADC-1, during MCA occlusion; ADC-2, after reperfusion; CBF-1, during MCA occlusion; CBF-2, after reperfusion. Images were acquired 1.5-2.5 h post-stroke and 0.5-3.0 h post re-perfusion.
Figure 3Temporally acquired 10 post-contrast Look-Locker (L-L) T-weighted images (TWI) obtained over about 25 min following a bolus injection of Gd-DTPA. The images demonstrate a region of enhancement that increased in size and signal intensity over the first 5 scans and then decreased over time. The color scale bar on top represents lowest to highest values in arbitrary units from left to right (black to white).
Figure 4Temporally acquired 10 post-contrast L-L TWIs obtained over about 25 min following a step-down infusion of Gd-DTPA. The images demonstrate a region of enhancement that increased in size and signal intensity over the first 4–5 scans before reaching a relatively steady state. The color scale bar on top represents lowest to highest values in arbitrary units from left to right (black to white). Note the persistent white- and red-tinged pixels suggestive of greater magnitude of leakage in the center of the enhancing region representing the probable source of leakage.
Figure 5Quantification of differences in spatial and temporal expansion of enhancing areas with bolus and SDI inputs. (A) Normalized area measurements (mean ± standard deviation) are plotted as a function of time for the bolus (n = 8) and step-down infusion (n = 6) protocols. The first scan showed few enhancing pixels and is not plotted. Both inputs showed similarly increasing areas for the first 4 scans plotted. The enhancing area for the bolus input, however, began to decrease after the first 5 scans and continued to decrease for the remainder of the study (scans 6–10). Note that the mean last point has dropped down to nearly the same level as the first point shown (i.e., for the 2nd scan). In comparison, the area of enhancement for the step-down protocol increased for the first 4–5 scans before reaching a relatively steady state (scans 6–10). (B) Plot showing the areas under the curve (AUC) for the two input functions which differed significantly for the bolus versus step-down injections on scans 8 and 9. The difference between the two mean values was significant (*p = 0.03). The values are scaled along the left Y-axis. (C) Plot showing the maximum enhancing pixels from the two inputs as corrected fractions of ipsilateral hemisphere. The SDI enhanced pixels covered about 30% whereas those from bolus covered about 12% of the total, the difference being statistically significant (*p = 0.05). These values are scaled along the right Y-axis; error bars represent standard error of the mean.