Leen Maes1, Alexandra De Kegel, Hilde Van Waelvelde, Ingeborg Dhooge. 1. *Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Ghent University; †Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Artevelde University College-Ghent University; ‡University Hospital Ghent, Department of Oto-rhino-laryngology; and §Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The clinical balance performance of normal-hearing (NH) children was compared with the balance performance of hearing-impaired (HI) children with and without vestibular dysfunction to identify an association between vestibular function and motor performance. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-six children (mean age, 7 yr 5 mo; range, 3 yr 8 mo-12 yr 11 mo) divided into three groups: NH children with normal vestibular responses, HI children with normal vestibular responses, and HI children with abnormal vestibular function. INTERVENTIONS: A vestibular test protocol (rotatory and collic vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing) in combination with three clinical balance tests (balance beam walking, one-leg hopping, one-leg stance). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical balance performance. RESULTS: HI children with abnormal vestibular test results obtained the lowest quotients of motor performance, which were significantly lower compared with the NH group (p < 0.001 for balance beam walking and one-leg stance; p = 0.003 for one-leg hopping). The balance performance of the HI group with normal vestibular responses was better in comparison with the vestibular impaired group but still significantly lower compared with the NH group (p = 0.020 for balance beam walking; p = 0.001 for one-leg stance; not significant for one-leg hopping). CONCLUSION: These results indicate an association between vestibular function and motor performance in HI children, with a more distinct motor deterioration if a vestibular impairment is superimposed to the auditory dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE: The clinical balance performance of normal-hearing (NH) children was compared with the balance performance of hearing-impaired (HI) children with and without vestibular dysfunction to identify an association between vestibular function and motor performance. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-six children (mean age, 7 yr 5 mo; range, 3 yr 8 mo-12 yr 11 mo) divided into three groups: NH children with normal vestibular responses, HI children with normal vestibular responses, and HI children with abnormal vestibular function. INTERVENTIONS: A vestibular test protocol (rotatory and collic vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing) in combination with three clinical balance tests (balance beam walking, one-leg hopping, one-leg stance). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical balance performance. RESULTS: HI children with abnormal vestibular test results obtained the lowest quotients of motor performance, which were significantly lower compared with the NH group (p < 0.001 for balance beam walking and one-leg stance; p = 0.003 for one-leg hopping). The balance performance of the HI group with normal vestibular responses was better in comparison with the vestibular impaired group but still significantly lower compared with the NH group (p = 0.020 for balance beam walking; p = 0.001 for one-leg stance; not significant for one-leg hopping). CONCLUSION: These results indicate an association between vestibular function and motor performance in HI children, with a more distinct motor deterioration if a vestibular impairment is superimposed to the auditory dysfunction.
Authors: Anisha Singh; Hannah Heet; Dana S Guggenheim; Margaret Lim; Bhavika Garg; Matthew Bao; Sherri L Smith; Doug Garrison; Eileen M Raynor; Janet W Lee; Jordan Wrigley; Kristal M Riska Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2022 May/Jun Impact factor: 3.562
Authors: Sarie Martens; Ingeborg Dhooge; Cleo Dhondt; Saartje Vanaudenaerde; Marieke Sucaet; Lotte Rombaut; An Boudewyns; Christian Desloovere; Sebastien Janssens de Varebeke; Anne-Sophie Vinck; Robby Vanspauwen; Dominique Verschueren; Ina Foulon; Charlotte Staelens; Karen Van den Broeck; Claudia De Valck; Naima Deggouj; Nele Lemkens; Lisa Haverbeke; Mieke De Bock; Okan Öz; Frank Declau; Benoit Devroede; Christoph Verhoye; Leen Maes Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Max Gerdsen; Cathérine Jorissen; Daphne Catharina Francisca Pustjens; Janke Roelofke Hof; Vincent Van Rompaey; Raymond Van De Berg; Josine Christine Colette Widdershoven Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 3.569
Authors: Ruth Van Hecke; Frederik J A Deconinck; Jan R Wiersema; Chloe Clauws; Maya Danneels; Ingeborg Dhooge; Laura Leyssens; Hilde Van Waelvelde; Leen Maes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Victor M Peñeñory; Cristina Manresa-Yee; Inmaculada Riquelme; Cesar A Collazos; Habib M Fardoun Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 3.576