| Literature DB >> 34633335 |
Ruijie Wang1,2, Xiuhua Chao1,2, Jianfen Luo1,2, Daogong Zhang1, Jiliang Xu1, Xianfeng Liu1, Zhaomin Fan1, Haibo Wang1, Lei Xu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To date, systematically objective evaluations of vestibular function in children with cochlear implantation (CI) have been conducted sparsely, especially in children with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS).Entities:
Keywords: Cochlear implantation; LVAS; children; vestibular function
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34633335 PMCID: PMC9249293 DOI: 10.3233/VES-190763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vestib Res ISSN: 0957-4271 Impact factor: 2.354
Demographic characteristics of the 34 patients in this study
| Mean age at implantation | 8.1±3.7 (range 4–17) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 22 (64.7%) |
| Female | 12 (35.3%) |
| Hearing loss origin | |
| Congenital | 26 (76.5%) |
| Progressive | 8 (23.5%) |
| Implant side | |
| Left | 15 (44.1%) |
| Right | 19 (55.9%) |
| Surgical approach | |
| RW | 18 (52.9%) |
| Extended RW | 16 (47.1%) |
| CT scan | |
| Normal | 16 (47.1%) |
| EVA | 18 (52.9%) |
| Implant | |
| Nucleus CI24RECA | 16 (47.1%) |
| Nucleus CI24REST | 3 (8.8%) |
| Nucleus 422 | 5 (14.7%) |
| Med-EL FLEX28 | 4 (11.8%) |
| Nurotron CS-10A | 6 (17.6%) |
RW: round window, EVA: enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct.
The normal objective evaluation results of vestibular function pre-CI and 9 months post CI (implanted side, patients, n%)
| Pre-CI (n, %) | 9 months post CI (n, %) | |||||
| Test | All | LVAS | Normal CT | All | LVAS | Normal CT |
| Caloric | 21 (61.8) | 11 (61.1) | 10 (62.5) | 17 (50.0) | 6 (33.3) | 11 (68.8) |
| cVEMP | 30 (88.2) | 14 (77.8) | 16 (100.0) | 16 (47.1) | 9 (50.0) | 7 (43.8) |
| oVEMP | 25 (73.5) | 13 (72.2) | 12 (75.0) | 14 (41.2) | 10 (55.6) | 4 (25.0) |
| vHIT | ||||||
| HSC | 32 (94.1) | 17 (94.4) | 15 (93.8) | 31 (91.2) | 15 (83.3) | 16 (100.0) |
| SSC | 34 (100.0) | 18 (100.0) | 16 (100.0) | 33 (97.1) | 17 (94.4) | 16 (100.0) |
| PSC | 33 (97.1) | 17 (94.4) | 16 (100.0) | 32 (94.1) | 16 (88.9) | 16 (100.0) |
n: number; cVEMP: cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential, oVEMP: ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential, vHIT: video head impulse test; HSC: horizontal semicircular canal, SSC: superior semicircular canal, PSC: posterior semicircular canal; All: all the 34 children, LVAS: children with LVAS (large vestibular aqueduct syndrome), Normal CT: children with normal CT scan.
Fig. 1The variations of vestibular function test results (implanted side, patients, n%). (A) Caloric test. (B) cVEMP. (C) oVEMP. All: all the 34 children, LVAS: children with LVAS, Normal CT: children with normal CT. Mc Nemar test: Pre vs post, Y axis: abnormal response percentage of tested patients (%), pre: pre-CI, post: 9 months post CI, *p < 0.01.
Fig. 2The deterioration rates of all the five vestibular end-organ functions at postoperative month 9 (%). Chi-square test, All (caloric test vs SSC and PSC, p < 0.05; cVEMP vs HSC, SSC and PSC, p < 0.05; oVEMP vs HSC, SSC and PSC, p < 0.05), LVAS (caloric test vs SSC and PSC, p < 0.05; cVEMP vs SSC and PSC, p < 0.05), Normal CT (cVEMP vs HSC, SSC and PSC, p < 0.05; oVEMP vs HSC, SSC and PSC, p < 0.05).