Literature DB >> 25275339

Quality-of-life improvement after free gracilis muscle transfer for smile restoration in patients with facial paralysis.

Robin W Lindsay1, Prabhat Bhama1, Tessa A Hadlock1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Facial paralysis can contribute to disfigurement, psychological difficulties, and an inability to convey emotion via facial expression. In patients unable to perform a meaningful smile, free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT) can often restore smile function. However, little is known about the impact on disease-specific quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: To determine quantitatively whether FGMT improves quality of life in patients with facial paralysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective evaluation of 154 FGMTs performed at a facial nerve center on 148 patients with facial paralysis. The Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) survey and Facial Assessment by Computer Evaluation software (FACE-gram) were used to quantify quality-of-life improvement, oral commissure excursion, and symmetry with smile. INTERVENTION: Free gracilis muscle transfer. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in FaCE score, oral commissure excursion, and symmetry with smile.
RESULTS: There were 127 successful FGMTs on 124 patients and 14 failed procedures on 13 patients. Mean (SD) FaCE score increased significantly after successful FGMT (42.30 [15.9] vs 58.5 [17.60]; paired 2-tailed t test, P < .001). Mean (SD) FACE scores improved significantly in all subgroups (nonflaccid cohort, 37.8 [19.9] vs 52.9 [19.3]; P = .02; flaccid cohort, 43.1 [15.1] vs 59.6 [17.2]; P < .001; trigeminal innervation cohort, 38.9 [14.6] vs 55.2 [18.2]; P < .001; cross-face nerve graft cohort, 47.3 [16.6] vs 61.7 [16.9]; P < .001) except the failure cohort (36.5 [20.8] vs 33.5 [17.9]; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = .15). Analysis of 40 patients' photographs revealed a mean (SD) preoperative and postoperative excursion on the affected side of -0.88 (3.79) and 7.68 (3.38), respectively (P < .001); symmetry with smile improved from a mean (SD) of 13.8 (7.46) to 4.88 (3.47) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Free gracilis muscle transfer has become a mainstay in the management armamentarium for patients with severe reduction in oral commissure movement after facial nerve insult and recovery. We found a quantitative improvement in quality of life after FGMT in patients who could not recover a meaningful smile after facial nerve insult. Quality-of-life improvement was not statistically different between donor nerve groups or facial paralysis types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25275339     DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  13 in total

1.  Speech and Communicative Participation in Patients With Facial Paralysis.

Authors:  James H Kim; Laurel M Fisher; Lindsay Reder; Edie R Hapner; Jon-Paul Pepper
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Toward the Bionic Face: A Novel Neuroprosthetic Device Paradigm for Facial Reanimation Consisting of Neural Blockade and Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Nate Jowett; Robert E Kearney; Christopher J Knox; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Selective Stimulation of Facial Muscles Following Chronic Intraneural Electrode Array Implantation and Facial Nerve Injury in the Feline Model.

Authors:  Ronald Sahyouni; Yarah M Haidar; Omid Moshtaghi; Beverly Y Wang; Hamid R Djalilian; John C Middlebrooks; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Creating Value in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Faryan Jalalabadi; Shayan A Izaddoost; Edward M Reece
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Initial severity of motor and non-motor disabilities in patients with facial palsy: an assessment using patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Gerd Fabian Volk; Thordis Granitzka; Helene Kreysa; Carsten M Klingner; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Selective stimulation of facial muscles with a penetrating electrode array in the feline model.

Authors:  Ronald Sahyouni; Jay Bhatt; Hamid R Djalilian; William C Tang; John C Middlebrooks; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  The Multivector Gracilis Free Functional Muscle Flap for Facial Reanimation.

Authors:  Kofi O Boahene; James Owusu; Lisa Ishii; Masaru Ishii; Shaun Desai; Irene Kim; Leslie Kim; Patrick Byrne
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

8.  Association Among Facial Paralysis, Depression, and Quality of Life in Facial Plastic Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Jason C Nellis; Masaru Ishii; Patrick J Byrne; Kofi D O Boahene; Jacob K Dey; Lisa E Ishii
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

9.  Assessing anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with peripheral facial palsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferran Cuenca-Martínez; Eva Zapardiel-Sánchez; Enrique Carrasco-González; Roy La Touche; Luis Suso-Martí
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Evaluating Functional Outcomes in Reanimation Surgery for Chronic Facial Paralysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ricardo Rodriguez Colon; Jenn J Park; Daniel Boczar; Gustave K Diep; Zoe P Berman; Jorge Trilles; Bachar F Chaya; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.