Literature DB >> 27040558

Initial severity of motor and non-motor disabilities in patients with facial palsy: an assessment using patient-reported outcome measures.

Gerd Fabian Volk1,2, Thordis Granitzka1,2, Helene Kreysa3, Carsten M Klingner4, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius5,6.   

Abstract

Patients with facial palsy (FP) not only suffer from their facial movement disorder, but also from social and psychological disabilities. These can be assessed by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) like the quality-of-life Short-Form 36 Item Questionnaire (SF36) or FP-specific instruments like the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (FaCE) or the Facial Disability Index (FDI). Not much is known about factors influencing PROMs in patients with FP. We identified predictors for baseline SF36, FaCE, and FDI scoring in 256 patients with unilateral peripheral FP using univariate correlation and multivariate linear regression analyses. Mean age was 52 ± 18 years. 153 patients (60 %) were female. 90 patients (31 %) and 176 patients (69 %) were first seen <90 or >90 days after onset, respectively, i.e., with acute or chronic FP. House-Brackmann grading was 3.9 ± 1.4. FaCE subscores varied from 41 ± 28 to 71 ± 26, FDI scores from 65 ± 20 to 70 ± 22, and SF36 domains from 52 ± 20 to 80 ± 24. Older age, female gender, higher House-Brackmann grading, and initial assessment >90 days after onset were independent predictors for lower FaCE subscores and partly for lower FDI subscores (all p < 0.05). Older age and female gender were best predictors for lower results in SF36 domains. Comorbidity was associated with lower SF General health perception and lower SF36 Emotional role (all p < 0.05). Specific PROMs reveal that older and female patients and patients with chronic FP suffer particularly from motor and non-motor disabilities related to FP. Comorbidity unrelated to the FP could additionally impact the quality of life of patients with FP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bell’s palsy; Facial nerve; Facial nerve reconstruction; Patient-oriented methods; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27040558     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4018-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  33 in total

1.  Assessing impairment and disability of facial paralysis in patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  John Lee; Kevin Fung; Steven P Lownie; Lorne S Parnes
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-01

2.  [An index for paresis and defective healing--an easily applied method for objectively determining therapeutic results in facial paresis (author's transl)].

Authors:  E Stennert; C H Limberg; K P Frentrup
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  J E Ware; B Gandek
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity.

Authors:  Adel Y Fattah; Anthony D R Gurusinghe; Javier Gavilan; Tessa A Hadlock; Jeff R Marcus; Henri Marres; Charles C Nduka; William H Slattery; Alison K Snyder-Warwick
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  [Emotional impact of facial palsy].

Authors:  C Dobel; W H R Miltner; O W Witte; G F Volk; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.057

6.  Botulinum toxin and quality of life in patients with facial paralysis.

Authors:  Ritvik P Mehta; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Measuring quality of life and patient satisfaction in facial paralysis patients: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Adelyn L Ho; Amie M Scott; Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Andrea L Pusic; Nancy Van Laeken
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Long-term subjective and objective outcome after primary repair of traumatic facial nerve injuries.

Authors:  Erik Frijters; Stefan O P Hofer; Marc A M Mureau
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Prognostication of recovery time after acute peripheral facial palsy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gerd Fabian Volk; Carsten Klingner; Mira Finkensieper; Otto W Witte; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Facial disability index (FDI): adaptation to Spanish, reliability and validity.

Authors:  Eduardo Gonzalez-Cardero; Pedro Infante-Cossio; Aurelio Cayuela; Manuel Acosta-Feria; Jose-Luis Gutierrez-Perez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-11-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  Association of Socioeconomic, Personality, and Mental Health Factors With Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Facial Palsy.

Authors:  Tessa E Bruins; Martinus M van Veen; Tanja Mooibroek-Leeuwerke; Paul M N Werker; Dieuwke C Broekstra; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 2.  Psychometric properties of the Facial Disability Index in patients with facial palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fatih Özden; İsmet Tümtürk; Zübeyir Sarı
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Continual rehabilitation motivation of patients with postparalytic facial nerve syndrome.

Authors:  Maike Osthues; Anna-Maria Kuttenreich; Gerd Fabian Volk; Christian Dobel; Bernhard Strauss; Uwe Altmann; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Face-to-Face Versus Video Assessment of Facial Paralysis: Implications for Telemedicine.

Authors:  Jian Rong Tan; Susan Coulson; Melanie Keep
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Assessing anxiety, depression and quality of life in patients with peripheral facial palsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferran Cuenca-Martínez; Eva Zapardiel-Sánchez; Enrique Carrasco-González; Roy La Touche; Luis Suso-Martí
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Patient-Assessed Outcomes following Temporal Bone Fractures.

Authors:  Elias Antoniades; George Psillas; Konstantinos Polyzoidis; Ioannis Patsalas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

7.  Functional Reconstruction of Forehead and Midface Deficits Using the Endoscopic Technique and Bio-Absorbable Implants.

Authors:  Jared Johnson; Houmehr Hojjat; Michael T Chung; Khashayar Arianpour; Hani Rayess; Robert Eckert; Michael Carron
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 0.947

8.  A Systematic Review of Physical Rehabilitation of Facial Palsy.

Authors:  Annabelle Vaughan; Danielle Gardner; Anna Miles; Anna Copley; Rachel Wenke; Susan Coulson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Functional Outcome and Quality of Life After Hypoglossal-Facial Jump Nerve Suture.

Authors:  Gerd Fabian Volk; Maren Geitner; Katharina Geißler; Jovanna Thielker; Ashraf Raslan; Oliver Mothes; Christian Dobel; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-03-19

10.  Platelet-rich plasma can release nutrient factors to promote facial nerve crush injury recovery in rats.

Authors:  Liheng Li; Jing Cai; Yang Yuan; Yanyan Mao; Lei Xu; Yuechen Han; Jianfeng Li; Haibo Wang
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.484

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.