Literature DB >> 25274129

Sagittal gap balancing with the concept of a single radius femoral component in posterior cruciate sacrificing total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation.

Takehito Hananouchi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sagittal gap balancing (relation between flexion and extension gaps) with placement of trial femoral components and reduction of the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important, but it is not easy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether (1) the flexion and extension gaps were equal when a previously suggested three-dimensional planning for a single-radius femoral component (its sagittal centre is matched with flexion-extension axis of knee movement) is executed with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and whether (2) PSI was done with good accuracy, which did not affect the first purpose.
METHODS: Posterior cruciate ligament sacrificed (PS) TKA was performed on 12 joints. Using the patients' pre-operative computed tomography (CT) images, PSI was manufactured to fit on the bony surface of the knee joint and to simultaneously transfer pre-operative planning to the operating room. After osteotomy with PSI, gap measurements were calculated with the knee in flexion and extension. Angle deviations of both components were investigated with postoperative CT images.
RESULTS: The flexion gap (mean, 19.1 mm) was larger than the extension gap (mean, 12.3 mm) in all cases. Angle differences between pre- and postoperative alignments were within 3° in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Although PSI executed the pre-operative planning with good accuracy, the flexion gap is always larger than the extension gap. This finding suggests that surgeons may not aim for equal gaps of flexion and extension in PS-TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274129     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2536-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  36 in total

1.  Effects of posterior cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral joint gap.

Authors:  Y Kadoya; A Kobayashi; T Komatsu; S Nakagawa; Y Yamano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap.

Authors:  Michael Tanzer; Karen Smith; Stephen Burnett
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Femoral component sizing in total knee arthroplasty: size matched resection versus flexion space balancing.

Authors:  Stephen J Incavo; Kathryn M Coughlin; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Femoral component placement changes soft tissue balance in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Muratsu; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Seiji Kubo; Akihiro Maruo; Hidetoshi Miya; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Intraoperative soft tissue balance reflects minimum 5-year midterm outcomes in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Seiji Kubo; Takehiko Matsushita; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Primitive results after medial-pivot knee arthroplasties: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Fan; Justin Tzung-Shian Hsieh; Ming-Shium Hsieh; Ying-Chieh Shih; Chian-Her Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The influence of the tibial slope on intra-operative soft tissue balance in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinya Oka; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Seiji Kubo; Takehiko Matsushita; Kazunari Ishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  CT-based planning of a single-radius femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the ROBODOC system.

Authors:  Takehito Hananouchi; Nobuo Nakamura; Akihiro Kakimoto; Hideki Yohsikawa; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Intra-operative gaps affect outcome and postoperative kinematics in vivo following cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eisaku Fujimoto; Yoshiaki Sasashige; Tetsuya Tomita; Hirofumi Sasaki; Yoriko Touten; Yuusuke Fujiwara; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Patient specific instrumentation versus conventional knee arthroplasty: comparative study.

Authors:  Vlad Predescu; Catalin Prescura; Razvan Olaru; Liliana Savin; Paul Botez; Bogdan Deleanu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Pre-operative radiological measurement of femoral rotation for prosthetic positioning in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Liliana Savin; Paul Botez; Dan Mihailescu; Vlad Predescu; Carmen Grierosu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.